Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FTHI vs QQQI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QQQI paid 15.2% of its price in cash against FTHI’s 8.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF and NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF.

8.9%FTHI cash paid, 1 year
15.2%QQQI cash paid, 1 year
+9.7%FTHI total return, 1 year
+16.4%QQQI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: FTHI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FTHI 50.8QQQI 50.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FTHI6.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%FTHI+9.7%8.9% of it arrived as cash6.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%FTHI+9.7%6.9 pts behind SPY
QQQI5.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% of it arrived as cash5.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% as cash5.3 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FTHI and QQQI hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FTHI and QQQI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFTHIQQQI
Apple Inc.7.75%7.79%
NVIDIA Corporation6.90%8.58%
Microsoft Corporation2.94%5.84%
Amazon.com, Inc.2.53%4.36%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A)2.41%3.24%
Broadcom Inc.2.01%2.70%
Alphabet Inc. (Class C)1.74%2.99%
Costco Wholesale Corporation1.74%1.74%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A)1.31%3.14%
Cisco Systems, Inc.1.26%1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.1.10%5.03%
Tesla, Inc.0.97%2.91%
Only in each
Only in FTHIOnly in QQQI
US Dollar 5.90%Lam Research Corp 1.58%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.67%Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.33%
Dell Technologies Inc. (Class C) 2.52%Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.28%
Bank of America Corporation 2.22%Texas Instruments Inc 1.07%
Johnson & Johnson 1.11%MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.94%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 1.09%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.85%
AbbVie Inc. 1.04%QUALCOMM Inc 0.83%
Eli Lilly and Company 0.95%Analog Devices Inc 0.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FTHI and QQQI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FTHIQQQIFTHIQQQIFTHIQQQI
3 months+1.7%−0.7%2.2%3.4%−0.6 pts+1.8 pts
6 months+9.8%+16.7%4.6%7.7%−8.2 pts−7.5 pts
1 year+9.7%+16.4%8.9%15.2%−6.9 pts−5.3 pts
3 years+47.9%not published28.9%not published−30.5 ptsnot published
Since launch+156.3%+59.6%82.6%39.9%−257.8 pts−12.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FTHI and QQQI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTHI
First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustNEOS
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized9.0%14.0%
Expense ratio0.75%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year8.9%15.2%
Price change, 1 year+0.3%−0.1%
Total return, 1 year+9.7%+16.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−6.9 pts−5.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published98%
Age4637 days962 days
Net assets$2.5bn$14.8bn

FTHI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTHI paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly.

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FTHI or QQQI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTHI paid 8.9% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 15.2%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FTHI or QQQI?
With every distribution reinvested, FTHI returned +9.7% and QQQI returned +16.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
Which is cheaper, FTHI or QQQI?
FTHI charges 0.75% a year and QQQI charges 0.68%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FTHI against QQQI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTHI against QQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fthi-vs-qqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources