Data as of .
FGSI vs YSPC: which paid, and which earned it?
FGSI and YSPC both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FGSI and YSPC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FGSI | Only in YSPC |
|---|---|
| Newmont Corporation 2.70% | United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 43.24% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.63% | United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 34.02% |
| Marvell Technology, Inc. 2.53% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 16.09% |
| Microsoft Corporation 2.45% | SPCX 10/16/2026 150.01 C 6.39% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 2.32% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 5.82% |
| DexCom, Inc. 2.28% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 162.500 0.62% |
| Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 2.22% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 157.500 0.07% |
| Target Corporation 2.22% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 152.500 -0.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGSI | YSPC | FGSI | YSPC | FGSI | YSPC | |
| 3 months | +2.4% | not published | 2.1% | not published | +0.2 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +10.0% | not published | 4.4% | not published | −8.0 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +5.3% | not published | 8.1% | not published | −11.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +11.9% | +6.4% | 9.8% | 10.9% | −14.3 pts | +5.3 pts |
| FGSI FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | YSPC YieldMax(R) [SpaceX] Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | YieldMax |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.6% | 63.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 1.01% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.1% | 10.9% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.2% | −5.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.3% | +6.4% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +1.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −11.3 pts | +5.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 0% |
| Age | 449 days | 65 days |
| Net assets | $2m | $32m |
FGSI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.
YSPC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 15, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, YSPC paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 63.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, FGSI or YSPC?
- FGSI charges 0.85% a year and YSPC charges 1.01%, so FGSI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FGSI against YSPC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fgsi-vs-yspc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.