Which paid more, FGSI or XIMR?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FGSI paid 8.3% of its starting price in cash and XIMR paid 7.0%, so FGSI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, FGSI or XIMR?

With every distribution reinvested, FGSI returned +9.0% and XIMR +7.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, FGSI or XIMR?

FGSI and XIMR both charge 0.85% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

FGSI vs XIMR: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FGSI paid 8.3% of its price in cash against XIMR’s 7.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FGSI and XIMR

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $2.0m for FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF and $26m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March.

FGSI on its own →XIMR on its own →

At a glance

8.3%

FGSI cash paid, 1 year

7.0%

XIMR cash paid, 1 year

+9.0%

FGSI total return, 1 year

+7.9%

XIMR total return, 1 year

FGSI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 About even with FTGS

FGSI

+9.0%

FTGS

+8.8%

About even with FTGS

FGSI over 1 year: paid 8.3%, price +0.2%, total +9.0%, FTGS +8.8%, +0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FTGS

+8.8%

FGSI

+9.0%

8.3% of it arrived as cash

about even with FTGS

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with FTGS

FGSI over 1 year: paid 8.3%, price +0.2%, total +9.0%, FTGS +8.8%, +0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FTGS

+8.8%

FGSI

+9.0%

8.3% cash

about even with FTGS

8.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FGSI over 1 year: paid 8.3%, price +0.2%, total +9.0%, FTGS +8.8%, +0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

XIMR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 6.9 pts behind VOO

XIMR

+7.9%

VOO

+14.8%

6.9 pts behind VOO

XIMR over 1 year: paid 7.0%, price +0.7%, total +7.9%, VOO +14.8%, −6.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

XIMR

+7.9%

7.0% of it arrived as cash

6.9 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

6.9 pts behind VOO

XIMR over 1 year: paid 7.0%, price +0.7%, total +7.9%, VOO +14.8%, −6.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

XIMR

+7.9%

6.9 pts behind VOO

7.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. XIMR over 1 year: paid 7.0%, price +0.7%, total +7.9%, VOO +14.8%, −6.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.85% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; XIMR is 13.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FGSI vs XIMR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	FGSI	XIMR
Paid and earned
Measure	FGSI	XIMR
Total return, 1 year	+9.0%	+7.9%
Price change, 1 year	rose 0.2%	rose 0.7%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	53% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment	60% of the Nov 3, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	FGSI	XIMR
Benchmark	First Trust Growth Strength ETF, measured through FTGS	Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOO
Cost and size
Measure	FGSI	XIMR
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.85%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$2.0m	$26m
Holdings
Measure	FGSI	XIMR
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · XIMR scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score63.2FGSI66.2XIMR

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

FGSI 63.2

XIMR 66.2

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, FGSI and XIMR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FGSI XIMR

Only in one fund ↓

Only in FGSI

Vertiv Holdings Co (Class A) 2.28%

Eli Lilly and Company 2.25%

United Therapeutics Corporation 2.25%

Blackstone Inc. 2.21%

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2.20%

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 2.18%

General Dynamics Corporation 2.16%

S&P Global Inc. 2.16%

Only in XIMR

2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.06 114.65%

2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 648.56 1.13%

2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 583.70 -0.61%

2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 648.56 -18.68%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FGSI FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF · Writes calls on the S&P 500, measured against The Growth Strength Index, paying monthly XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly

Issuer First Trust First Trust

Strategy option income buffer with income

Benchmark First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)

Pays monthly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 8.3% 7.4%

Expense ratio 0.85% 0.85%

Cash paid, 1 year 8.3% 7.0%

Price change, 1 year +0.2% +0.7%

Total return, 1 year +9.0% +7.9%

Benchmark return, 1 year +8.8% +14.8%

Ahead or behind +0.2 pts −6.9 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 53% 60%

Age 1.4 years 2.6 years

Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $2.0m $26m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FGSI vs XIMR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	FGSI	XIMR	FGSI	XIMR	FGSI	XIMR
3 months	−2.2%	+1.3%	2.0%	1.8%	+0.6 pts	+1.4 pts
6 months	+6.3%	+2.8%	4.3%	3.7%	+0.2 pts	−2.2 pts
1 year	+9.0%	+7.9%	8.3%	7.0%	+0.2 pts	−6.9 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FGSI Jun 2025 · XIMR Mar 2024	+13.6%	+20.0%	11.3%	17.4%	−0.7 pts	−33.3 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

FGSI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FGSI paid 8.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.0%. First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) returned +8.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.3%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 53% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

XIMR

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XIMR paid 7.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.9%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.4%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 60% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FGSI or XIMR?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FGSI paid 8.3% of its starting price in cash and XIMR paid 7.0%, so FGSI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FGSI or XIMR?: With every distribution reinvested, FGSI returned +9.0% and XIMR +7.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FGSI or XIMR?: FGSI and XIMR both charge 0.85% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FGSI vs XIJN FGSI vs XIDE FGSI vs XISE FGSI vs LJAN XIMR vs XISE XIMR vs OARK XIMR vs SDTY XIMR vs YSPC

Where to next

First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) →Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) →FGSI on its own →XIMR on its own →FGSI dividend history →FGSI holdings →XIMR dividend history →XIMR holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

FGSI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

FGSI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

FGSI 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

First Trust page for FGSI ↗

XIMR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XIMR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

XIMR 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

First Trust page for XIMR ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FGSI against XIMR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fgsi-vs-ximr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.