Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FGSI vs QYLG: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QYLG paid 17.4% of its price in cash against FGSI’s 8.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

8.1%FGSI cash paid, 1 year
17.4%QYLG cash paid, 1 year
+5.3%FGSI total return, 1 year
+22.2%QYLG total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FGSI 33QYLG 71.13.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FGSI11.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%FGSI+5.3%8.1% as cash11.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%FGSI+5.3%11.3 pts behind SPY
QYLGAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% as cashabout even with QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FGSI and QYLG hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FGSI and QYLG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFGSIQYLG
Microsoft Corporation2.45%5.77%
NVIDIA Corporation2.15%8.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A)2.03%3.11%
Broadcom Inc.1.90%2.67%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A)2.63%1.77%
Costco Wholesale Corporation1.85%1.73%
Netflix, Inc.2.04%1.30%
Marvell Technology, Inc.2.53%0.93%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc2.15%0.85%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.2.22%0.60%
Fortinet, Inc.2.06%0.54%
Adobe Incorporated2.05%0.43%
Only in each
Only in FGSIOnly in QYLG
Newmont Corporation 2.70%APPLE INC 7.73%
Arista Networks, Inc. 2.32%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.99%
Target Corporation 2.22%AMAZON.COM INC 4.31%
CME Group Inc. 2.21%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.97%
ResMed Inc. 2.21%ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.23%
Garmin Ltd. 2.15%TESLA INC 3.01%
Incyte Corporation 2.09%ALPHABET INC-CL C 3.00%
Mastercard Incorporated 2.03%SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 2.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FGSI and QYLG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FGSIQYLGFGSIQYLGFGSIQYLG
3 months+2.4%−0.1%2.1%2.1%+0.2 pts+2.4 pts
6 months+10.0%+19.6%4.4%4.6%−8.0 pts−4.7 pts
1 year+5.3%+22.2%8.1%17.4%−11.3 pts+0.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+76.2%not published51.1%not published−22.0 pts
Since launch+11.9%+122.0%9.8%75.3%−14.3 pts−52.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FGSI and QYLG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FGSI
FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustGlobal X
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.6%6.8%
Expense ratio0.85%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year8.1%17.4%
Price change, 1 year−3.2%+2.4%
Total return, 1 year+5.3%+22.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−11.3 pts+0.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published96%
Age449 days2187 days
Net assets$2m$175m

FGSI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.

QYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FGSI or QYLG?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting price in cash and QYLG paid 17.4%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FGSI or QYLG?
With every distribution reinvested, FGSI returned +5.3% and QYLG returned +22.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
Which is cheaper, FGSI or QYLG?
FGSI charges 0.85% a year and QYLG charges 0.35%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FGSI against QYLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FGSI against QYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fgsi-vs-qylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources