Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

FEPI vs QVOL: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

FEPI and QVOL both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FEPI and QVOL

Net assets: $679m on Nov 3, 2026 for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF, and $49m on Aug 31, 2026 for Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF.

At a glance
22.1%
FEPI cash paid, 1 year
6.4%
QVOL cash paid, since launch, May 12, 2026
+2.9%
FEPI total return, 1 year
−7.8%
QVOL total return, since launch, May 12, 2026
FEPI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured
FEPI
+2.9%
none

Not measured

FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FEPI

+2.9%

22.1% as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FEPI

+2.9%

22.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QVOL · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 7 pts behind ONEQ
QVOL
−7.8%
ONEQ
−0.8%

7 pts behind ONEQ

QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −13.6%, total −7.8%, ONEQ −0.8%, −7.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ONEQ

−0.8%

QVOL

−7.8%

7 pts behind ONEQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

7 pts behind ONEQ

QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −13.6%, total −7.8%, ONEQ −0.8%, −7.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ONEQ

−0.8%

QVOL

−7.8%

7 pts behind ONEQ

6.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −13.6%, total −7.8%, ONEQ −0.8%, −7.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

FEPI costs 0.17 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FEPI vs QVOL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureFEPIQVOL
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+2.9%not published
Price changefell 19.3% (1 year)fell 13.6% (since May 12, 2026)
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, measured through ONEQ
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 7.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.82%
Net assets, FEPI as of Nov 3, 2026 and QVOL as of Aug 31, 2026$679m$49m
Holdings
Holdings in common47%

Method

What they share

47%

By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and QVOL hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

47% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FEPI QVOL
BROADCOM INC. 6.95% 6.42%
ALPHABET INC. 7.00% 6.17%
ORACLE CORPORATION 4.23% 4.93%
APPLE INC. 6.90% 4.21%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.88% 4.19%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 6.04% 4.03%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.21% 3.90%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 4.25% 3.33%
INTEL CORPORATION 4.10% 2.38%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.23% 2.31%
NETFLIX, INC. 4.21% 2.11%
SANDISK CORPORATION 4.09% 1.77%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FEPI
TESLA, INC. 4.22%
Only in QVOL
Marvell Technology Inc 2.56%
Applied Materials Inc 2.19%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.19%
CoreWeave Inc 2.00%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.98%
Lam Research Corp 1.61%
DoorDash Inc 1.60%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.41%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF · Covered call, paying weekly QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF · Option income on ONEQ, paying monthly
Strategy covered call option income
Benchmark none Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 24.9% 15.3%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.82%
Cash paid, 1 year 22.1% 6.4% (since launch, May 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −19.3% −13.6% (since launch, May 12, 2026)
Total return, 1 year +2.9% −7.8% (since launch, May 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year not published −0.8% (since launch, May 12, 2026)
Ahead or behind not available −7.0 pts (since launch, May 12, 2026)
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 3.1 years 176 days
Net assets, FEPI as of Nov 3, 2026 and QVOL as of Aug 31, 2026 $679m $49m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FEPI vs QVOL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowFEPIQVOLFEPIQVOLFEPIQVOL
3 months−1.5%−12.2%6.4%3.2%not measured−10.0 pts
6 months−2.4%–11.2%–not measured–
1 year+2.9%–22.1%–not measured–
3 years+55.6%–69.1%–not measured–
Since launchNot the same days: FEPI Oct 2023 · QVOL May 2026+56.7%−7.8%69.6%6.4%not measured−7.0 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FEPI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.9%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.

QVOL

Over the period from its first trade on May 12, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, QVOL paid 6.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.8%. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) returned −0.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, FEPI or QVOL?
FEPI charges 0.65% a year and QVOL charges 0.82%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FEPI against QVOL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-qvol

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.