Data as of .
FEPI vs OVLH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year FEPI paid 23.4% of its price in cash against OVLH’s 0.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OVLH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and OVLH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FEPI | Only in OVLH |
|---|---|
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 9.98% | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 8.91% | |
| ALPHABET INC. 8.83% | |
| BROADCOM INC. 8.05% | |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.76% | |
| TESLA, INC. 7.47% | |
| INTEL CORPORATION 5.24% | |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEPI | OVLH | FEPI | OVLH | FEPI | OVLH | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +0.5% | 6.0% | 0.0% | +5.4 pts | −1.7 pts |
| 6 months | +17.2% | +11.0% | 12.8% | 0.0% | −7.1 pts | −7.0 pts |
| 1 year | +15.7% | +9.1% | 23.4% | 0.3% | −6.1 pts | −7.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +54.7% | not published | 1.7% | not published | −23.7 pts |
| Since launch | +69.0% | +73.7% | 66.8% | 3.1% | −28.5 pts | −45.2 pts |
| FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF Put-selling overlay, hedged on SPY, paying annual | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | REX | Overlay Shares |
| Strategy | covered call | put-selling overlay, hedged |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | weekly | annual |
| Payout rate, annualized | 24.9% | 0.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 23.4% | 0.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | −10.0% | +8.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.7% | +9.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.1 pts | −7.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1073 days | 2072 days |
| Net assets | $713m | $116m |
FEPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.
OVLH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVLH paid 0.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 0.3%, paid annual.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FEPI or OVLH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting price in cash and OVLH paid 0.3%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or OVLH?
- With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +15.7% and OVLH returned +9.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FEPI returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against OVLH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-ovlh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.