Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

FEPI vs LAPR: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its price in cash against LAPR’s 6.2%, though LAPR returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FEPI and LAPR

Net assets: $679m on Nov 3, 2026 for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF, and $11m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April.

At a glance
22.1%
FEPI cash paid, 1 year
6.2%
LAPR cash paid, 1 year
+2.9%
FEPI total return, 1 year
+6.2%
LAPR total return, 1 year
FEPI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured
FEPI
+2.9%
none

Not measured

FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FEPI

+2.9%

22.1% as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FEPI

+2.9%

22.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LAPR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.6 pts behind VOO
LAPR
+6.2%
VOO
+14.8%

8.6 pts behind VOO

LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.1%, total +6.2%, VOO +14.8%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LAPR

+6.2%

6.2% of it arrived as cash

8.6 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.6 pts behind VOO

LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.1%, total +6.2%, VOO +14.8%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LAPR

+6.2%

8.6 pts behind VOO

6.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.1%, total +6.2%, VOO +14.8%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

FEPI costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points; FEPI is far larger, $679m against $11m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FEPI vs LAPR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureFEPILAPR
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+2.9%+6.2%
Price change, 1 yearfell 19.3%fell 0.1%
Return of capital, issuer estimate57% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOO
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$679m$11m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and LAPR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FEPI LAPR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FEPI
ALPHABET INC. 7.00%
BROADCOM INC. 6.95%
APPLE INC. 6.90%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.68%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 6.04%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.88%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 4.25%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.23%
Only in LAPR
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF · Covered call, paying weekly LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly
Issuer REX Innovator
Strategy covered call buffer with income
Benchmark none Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 24.9% 6.7%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 22.1% 6.2%
Price change, 1 year −19.3% −0.1%
Total return, 1 year +2.9% +6.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +14.8%
Ahead or behind not available −8.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 57%
Age 3.1 years 2.6 years
Net assets, FEPI as of Nov 3, 2026 and LAPR as of Nov 4, 2026 $679m $11m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FEPI vs LAPR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowFEPILAPRFEPILAPRFEPILAPR
3 months−1.5%+1.0%6.4%1.7%not measured+1.1 pts
6 months−2.4%+2.4%11.2%3.3%not measured−2.6 pts
1 year+2.9%+6.2%22.1%6.2%not measured−8.6 pts
3 years+55.6%–69.1%–not measured–
Since launchNot the same days: FEPI Oct 2023 · LAPR Apr 2024+56.7%+16.8%69.6%15.0%not measured−34.6 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

LAPR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FEPI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.9%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.

LAPR

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LAPR paid 6.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 57% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FEPI or LAPR?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its starting price in cash and LAPR paid 6.2%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or LAPR?
With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +2.9% and LAPR +6.2% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FEPI or LAPR?
FEPI charges 0.65% a year and LAPR charges 0.79%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FEPI against LAPR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-lapr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.