Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FEPI vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year FEPI paid 23.4% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.

REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.

23.4%FEPI cash paid, 1 year
4.7%JULH cash paid, 1 year
+15.7%FEPI total return, 1 year
+4.5%JULH total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JULH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FEPI 33.5JULH 35.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FEPI6.1 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%FEPI+15.7%23.4% of it arrived as cash6.1 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%FEPI+15.7%23.4% as cash6.1 pts behind QQQ
JULH12.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%4.7% as cash12.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%12.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in FEPIOnly in JULH
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 9.98%TREASURY BILL 100.00%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 8.91%
ALPHABET INC. 8.83%
BROADCOM INC. 8.05%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.76%
TESLA, INC. 7.47%
INTEL CORPORATION 5.24%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FEPI and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FEPIJULHFEPIJULHFEPIJULH
3 months+2.9%+1.8%6.0%1.1%+5.4 pts−0.4 pts
6 months+17.2%+4.0%12.8%2.7%−7.1 pts−14.0 pts
1 year+15.7%+4.5%23.4%4.7%−6.1 pts−12.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+20.7%not published18.4%not published−57.7 pts
Since launch+69.0%+22.7%66.8%18.6%−28.5 pts−55.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FEPI and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerREXInnovator
Strategycovered calldefined income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysweeklyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized24.9%4.2%
Expense ratio0.65%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year23.4%4.7%
Price change, 1 year−10.0%−0.4%
Total return, 1 year+15.7%+4.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−6.1 pts−12.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1073 days1173 days
Net assets$713m$17m

FEPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.

JULH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FEPI or JULH?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.7%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or JULH?
With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +15.7% and JULH returned +4.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FEPI returned more.
Which is cheaper, FEPI or JULH?
FEPI charges 0.65% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FEPI against JULH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against JULH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-julh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources