Which paid more, FEPI or JULH?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.8%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or JULH?

With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +2.9% and JULH +4.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, FEPI or JULH?

FEPI charges 0.65% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

FEPI vs JULH: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.8%, though JULH returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FEPI and JULH

Net assets: $679m on Nov 3, 2026 for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF, and $18m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.

FEPI on its own →JULH on its own →

At a glance

22.1%

FEPI cash paid, 1 year

4.8%

JULH cash paid, 1 year

+2.9%

FEPI total return, 1 year

+4.9%

JULH total return, 1 year

FEPI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured

FEPI

+2.9%

none

Not measured

FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FEPI

+2.9%

22.1% as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FEPI

+2.9%

22.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

JULH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH

+4.9%

SPY

+14.8%

9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULH

+4.9%

4.8% of it arrived as cash

9.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULH

+4.9%

9.9 pts behind SPY

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

FEPI costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points; FEPI is far larger, $679m against $17m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FEPI vs JULH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	FEPI	JULH
Paid and earned
Measure	FEPI	JULH
Total return, 1 year	+2.9%	+4.9%
Price change, 1 year	fell 19.3%	fell 0.0%
Return of capital, issuer estimate		51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	FEPI	JULH
Benchmark	not published	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Measure	FEPI	JULH
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$679m	$17m
Holdings
Measure	FEPI	JULH
Holdings in common	0%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FEPI JULH

Only in one fund ↓

Only in FEPI

ALPHABET INC. 7.00%

BROADCOM INC. 6.95%

APPLE INC. 6.90%

NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.68%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 6.04%

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.88%

META PLATFORMS, INC. 4.25%

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.23%

Only in JULH

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF · Covered call, paying weekly JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly

Issuer REX Innovator

Strategy covered call defined income

Benchmark none S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays weekly quarterly

Payout rate, annualized 24.9% 6.5%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 22.1% 4.8%

Price change, 1 year −19.3% 0.0%

Total return, 1 year +2.9% +4.9%

Benchmark return, 1 year not published +14.8%

Ahead or behind not available −9.9 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published 51%

Age 3.1 years 3.3 years

Net assets, FEPI as of Nov 3, 2026 and JULH as of Nov 4, 2026 $679m $18m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FEPI vs JULH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	FEPI	JULH	FEPI	JULH	FEPI	JULH
3 months	−1.5%	+1.4%	6.4%	1.6%	not measured	+1.5 pts
6 months	−2.4%	+3.2%	11.2%	2.7%	not measured	−1.8 pts
1 year	+2.9%	+4.9%	22.1%	4.8%	not measured	−9.9 pts
3 years	+55.6%	+20.9%	69.1%	18.4%	not measured	−62.0 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FEPI Oct 2023 · JULH Jul 2023	+56.7%	+23.7%	69.6%	20.3%	not measured	−56.1 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

FEPI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.9%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.

JULH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FEPI or JULH?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.8%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or JULH?: With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +2.9% and JULH +4.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FEPI or JULH?: FEPI charges 0.65% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FEPI vs SPUT FEPI vs SCLZ FEPI vs OCTH FEPI vs QUSA JULH vs YYY JULH vs SIXH JULH vs ULTY JULH vs SDVD

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →FEPI on its own →JULH on its own →FEPI dividend history →FEPI holdings →JULH dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

FEPI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

FEPI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

REX page for FEPI ↗

JULH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

JULH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

JULH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for JULH ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FEPI against JULH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-julh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.