Data as of .
FEPI vs JANJ: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year FEPI paid 23.4% of its price in cash against JANJ’s 5.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JANJ scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and JANJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FEPI | Only in JANJ |
|---|---|
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 9.98% | TREASURY BILL 97.55% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 8.91% | TREASURY BILL 1.23% |
| ALPHABET INC. 8.83% | TREASURY BILL 1.22% |
| BROADCOM INC. 8.05% | |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.76% | |
| TESLA, INC. 7.47% | |
| INTEL CORPORATION 5.24% | |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEPI | JANJ | FEPI | JANJ | FEPI | JANJ | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +1.3% | 6.0% | 1.2% | +5.4 pts | −0.9 pts |
| 6 months | +17.2% | +5.0% | 12.8% | 2.5% | −7.1 pts | −13.0 pts |
| 1 year | +15.7% | +5.1% | 23.4% | 5.0% | −6.1 pts | −11.4 pts |
| Since launch | +69.0% | +15.9% | 66.8% | 13.2% | −28.5 pts | −50.5 pts |
| FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | JANJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | REX | Innovator |
| Strategy | covered call | defined income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | weekly | quarterly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 24.9% | 5.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 23.4% | 5.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | −10.0% | 0.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.7% | +5.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.1 pts | −11.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1073 days | 990 days |
| Net assets | $713m | $14m |
FEPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.
JANJ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JANJ paid 5.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FEPI or JANJ?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting price in cash and JANJ paid 5.0%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or JANJ?
- With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +15.7% and JANJ returned +5.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FEPI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FEPI or JANJ?
- FEPI charges 0.65% a year and JANJ charges 0.79%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against JANJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-janj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.