Data as of .
FDND vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year YMAG paid 35.5% of its price in cash against FDND’s 7.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: YMAG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDND and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDND | Only in YMAG |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 10.12% | YieldMax GOOGL Option Income S 15.87% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 9.98% | Yieldmax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.60% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 8.66% | YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.37% |
| Netflix, Inc. 5.90% | Yieldmax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.08% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 5.82% | YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 14.02% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.65% | YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 13.98% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 4.62% | Yieldmax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.08% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 4.36% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDND | YMAG | FDND | YMAG | FDND | YMAG | |
| 3 months | +8.9% | +6.1% | 2.0% | 9.4% | +8.5 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +18.8% | +15.4% | 4.3% | 21.1% | +4.8 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | −0.6% | +9.7% | 7.1% | 35.5% | −14.1 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +34.3% | +70.7% | 20.4% | 89.1% | −0.5 pts | −34.1 pts |
| FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF Option income on DIA, paying monthly | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | YieldMax |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 7.8% | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 7.1% | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −8.2% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.6% | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −14.1 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 911 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $10m | $297m |
FDND in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly.
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FDND or YMAG?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting price in cash and YMAG paid 35.5%, so YMAG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FDND or YMAG?
- With every distribution reinvested, FDND returned −0.6% and YMAG returned +9.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so YMAG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FDND or YMAG?
- FDND charges 0.75% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so FDND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDND against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fdnd-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.