Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FDND vs TPAY: which paid, and which earned it?

FDND and TPAY both write options for income.

FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF.

7.1%FDND cash paid, 1 year
5.8%TPAY cash paid, 1 year
−0.6%FDND total return, 1 year
+11.0%TPAY total return, 1 year
FDND14.1 pts behind DIA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
DIA+13.5%FDND−0.6%14.1 pts behind DIATotal return, distributions reinvestedDIA+13.5%FDND−0.6%14.1 pts behind DIA
TPAY0.8 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+11.8%TPAY+11.0%5.8% of it arrived as cash0.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+11.8%TPAY+11.0%0.8 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDND and TPAY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in FDNDOnly in TPAY
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 10.12%SPY 03/12/2027 33.67 C 61.75%
Amazon.com, Inc. 9.98%SPY 04/16/2027 33.18 C 33.20%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 8.66%SPYM 03/12/2027 3.33 C 5.05%
Netflix, Inc. 5.90%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 5.82%
Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.65%
Arista Networks, Inc. 4.62%
Salesforce, Inc. 4.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FDND and TPAY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FDNDTPAYFDNDTPAYFDNDTPAY
3 months+8.9%+1.5%2.0%2.4%+8.5 pts−0.8 pts
6 months+18.8%+17.3%4.3%5.3%+4.8 pts−0.7 pts
1 year−0.6%not published7.1%not published−14.1 ptsnot published
Since launch+34.3%+11.0%20.4%5.8%−0.5 pts−0.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FDND and TPAY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDND
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF
Option income on DIA, paying monthly
TPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustRoundhill
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkDow Jones Industrial Average (DIA)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized7.8%9.5%
Expense ratio0.75%0.49%
Cash paid, 1 year7.1%5.8% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−8.2%+4.9%
Total return, 1 year−0.6%+11.0% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+13.5%+11.8%
Ahead or behind−14.1 pts−0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age911 days212 days
Net assets$10m$2m

FDND in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly.

TPAY in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPAY paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, FDND or TPAY?
FDND charges 0.75% a year and TPAY charges 0.49%, so TPAY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDND against TPAY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDND against TPAY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fdnd-vs-tpay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources