Data as of .
EGGY vs SDVD: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year EGGY paid 28.1% of its price in cash against SDVD’s 9.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: EGGY scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EGGY and SDVD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EGGY | Only in SDVD |
|---|---|
| Seagate Technology Holdings PL 12.31% | National HealthCare Corporation 1.12% |
| Bloom Energy Corp 10.77% | First BanCorp. 1.04% |
| Micron Technology Inc 7.95% | OFG Bancorp 1.03% |
| Lumentum Holdings Inc 6.86% | The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. 1.01% |
| Astera Labs Inc 6.85% | Interparfums, Inc. 1.00% |
| Coherent Corp 5.81% | Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporat 1.00% |
| Vertiv Holdings Co 5.60% | VeriSign, Inc. 1.00% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.86% | Assurant, Inc. 0.99% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGGY | SDVD | EGGY | SDVD | EGGY | SDVD | |
| 3 months | −15.1% | −0.1% | 7.1% | 2.1% | −17.3 pts | −6.7 pts |
| 6 months | +27.6% | +8.3% | 19.4% | 4.4% | +9.6 pts | −4.3 pts |
| 1 year | +15.3% | +10.8% | 28.1% | 9.2% | −1.2 pts | −16.4 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +53.0% | not published | 30.7% | not published | −0.7 pts |
| Since launch | +42.3% | +47.6% | 45.5% | 29.7% | +11.8 pts | −4.1 pts |
| EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | SDVD FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Nest Egg | First Trust |
| Strategy | option income | dividend stocks with call overlay |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 34.8% | 8.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.92% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 28.1% | 9.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | −16.2% | +1.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.3% | +10.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +27.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.2 pts | −16.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 630 days | 1135 days |
| Net assets | $126m | $888m |
EGGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, EGGY paid 28.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 16.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.8%, paid monthly.
SDVD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, EGGY or SDVD?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, EGGY paid 28.1% of its starting price in cash and SDVD paid 9.2%, so EGGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, EGGY or SDVD?
- With every distribution reinvested, EGGY returned +15.3% and SDVD returned +10.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so EGGY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, EGGY or SDVD?
- EGGY charges 0.92% a year and SDVD charges 0.85%, so SDVD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EGGY against SDVD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/eggy-vs-sdvd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.