Data as of .
DYLG vs XIJN: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year DYLG paid 9.5% of its price in cash against XIJN’s 6.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and XIJN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in DYLG | Only in XIJN |
|---|---|
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 10.88% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® 100.51% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 9.35% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® 3.76% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.70% | US Dollar 0.76% |
| AMGEN INC 4.46% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.56% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.35% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.56% |
| TRAVELERS COS INC/THE 4.33% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.55% |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 4.25% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.55% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.04% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYLG | XIJN | DYLG | XIJN | DYLG | XIJN | |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +1.8% | 0.8% | 1.1% | +1.5 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | +4.0% | 2.1% | 3.5% | −0.9 pts | −14.0 pts |
| 1 year | +13.8% | +6.2% | 9.5% | 6.9% | +0.3 pts | −10.3 pts |
| 3 years | +47.0% | not published | 30.8% | not published | −9.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +44.7% | +16.6% | 30.7% | 14.7% | −8.3 pts | −27.4 pts |
| DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on DIA, paying monthly | XIJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | First Trust |
| Strategy | covered call | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 3.1% | 6.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.5% | 6.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | +3.5% | −0.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +6.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.3 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 59% | not published |
| Age | 1150 days | 816 days |
| Net assets | $6m | $53m |
DYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XIJN in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIJN paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DYLG or XIJN?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting price in cash and XIJN paid 6.9%, so DYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or XIJN?
- With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +13.8% and XIJN returned +6.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DYLG or XIJN?
- DYLG charges 0.35% a year and XIJN charges 0.85%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYLG against XIJN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-xijn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.