Data as of .
DYLG vs OARK: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OARK paid 37.4% of its price in cash against DYLG’s 9.5%, though DYLG returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and OARK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in DYLG | Only in OARK |
|---|---|
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 10.88% | TREASURY BILL 37.81% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 9.35% | TREASURY BILL 30.32% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.70% | TREASURY BILL 18.55% |
| AMGEN INC 4.46% | TREASURY BILL 10.80% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.35% | TREASURY BILL 2.51% |
| TRAVELERS COS INC/THE 4.33% | |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 4.25% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.04% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYLG | OARK | DYLG | OARK | DYLG | OARK | |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +3.9% | 0.8% | 9.0% | +1.5 pts | +6.4 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | +20.0% | 2.1% | 22.6% | −0.9 pts | −4.2 pts |
| 1 year | +13.8% | +6.6% | 9.5% | 37.4% | +0.3 pts | −15.2 pts |
| 3 years | +47.0% | +61.9% | 30.8% | 87.5% | −9.8 pts | −36.3 pts |
| Since launch | +44.7% | +58.8% | 30.7% | 89.4% | −8.3 pts | −96.7 pts |
| DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on DIA, paying monthly | OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 3.1% | 27.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 1.00% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.5% | 37.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +3.5% | −34.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +6.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.3 pts | −15.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 59% | 0% |
| Age | 1150 days | 1395 days |
| Net assets | $6m | $32m |
DYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
OARK in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OARK paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 34.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DYLG or OARK?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 37.4%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or OARK?
- With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +13.8% and OARK returned +6.6% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DYLG or OARK?
- DYLG charges 0.35% a year and OARK charges 1.00%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYLG against OARK, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-oark Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.