Data as of .
DYLG vs NLSI: which paid, and which earned it?
DYLG and NLSI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and NLSI hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYLG | NLSI |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 2.57% | 3.17% |
| Only in DYLG | Only in NLSI |
|---|---|
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 10.88% | Micron Technology Inc 14.23% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 9.35% | F5 Inc 3.90% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.70% | Progressive Corp/The 3.80% |
| AMGEN INC 4.46% | Adobe Inc 3.37% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.35% | Jack Henry & Associates Inc 3.32% |
| TRAVELERS COS INC/THE 4.33% | Universal Health Services Inc 3.23% |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 4.25% | Insulet Corp 3.19% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.04% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.19% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYLG | NLSI | DYLG | NLSI | DYLG | NLSI | |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +15.6% | 0.8% | 1.4% | +1.5 pts | +13.3 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | +24.6% | 2.1% | 2.8% | −0.9 pts | +6.6 pts |
| 1 year | +13.8% | not published | 9.5% | not published | +0.3 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +47.0% | not published | 30.8% | not published | −9.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +44.7% | +19.3% | 30.7% | 4.0% | −8.3 pts | +7.3 pts |
| DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on DIA, paying monthly | NLSI NEOS Long/Short Equity Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | NEOS |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 3.1% | 5.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 2.89% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.5% | 4.0% (since launch on Dec 10, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | +3.5% | +14.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +19.3% (since launch on Dec 10, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +12.0% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.3 pts | +7.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 59% | 100% |
| Age | 1150 days | 282 days |
| Net assets | $6m | $5m |
DYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
NLSI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 10, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, NLSI paid 4.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 31, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, DYLG or NLSI?
- DYLG charges 0.35% a year and NLSI charges 2.89%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYLG against NLSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-nlsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.