Which paid more, DYLG or LJUL?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting price in cash and LJUL paid 5.2%, so DYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or LJUL?

With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +14.8% and LJUL +5.3% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, DYLG or LJUL?

DYLG charges 0.35% a year and LJUL charges 0.79%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

DYLG vs LJUL: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its price in cash against LJUL’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DYLG and LJUL

Net assets: $4.8m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF, and $9.0m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July.

DYLG on its own →LJUL on its own →

At a glance

9.2%

DYLG cash paid, 1 year

5.2%

LJUL cash paid, 1 year

+14.8%

DYLG total return, 1 year

+5.3%

LJUL total return, 1 year

DYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured

DYLG

+14.8%

none

Not measured

DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DYLG

+14.8%

9.2% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DYLG

+14.8%

9.2% cash

9.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

LJUL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.5 pts behind VOO

LJUL

+5.3%

VOO

+14.8%

9.5 pts behind VOO

LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LJUL

+5.3%

5.2% of it arrived as cash

9.5 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.5 pts behind VOO

LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LJUL

+5.3%

9.5 pts behind VOO

5.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DYLG costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.5 points; LJUL is 1.9 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DYLG vs LJUL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	DYLG	LJUL
Paid and earned
Measure	DYLG	LJUL
Total return, 1 year	+14.8%	+5.3%
Price change, 1 year	rose 4.7%	fell 0.0%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	32% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment	40% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	DYLG	LJUL
Benchmark	not published	Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOO
Cost and size
Measure	DYLG	LJUL
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.79%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$4.8m	$9.0m
Holdings
Measure	DYLG	LJUL
Holdings in common	0%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and LJUL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DYLG LJUL

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DYLG

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. 11.60%

CATERPILLAR INC. 9.28%

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.29%

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 4.72%

AMGEN INC. 4.39%

The Travelers Companies, Inc. 4.26%

VISA INC. 4.17%

ALPHABET INC. 4.05%

Only in LJUL

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call, paying monthly LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly

Issuer Global X Innovator

Strategy covered call buffer with income

Benchmark none Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)

Pays monthly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 4.0% 5.3%

Expense ratio 0.35% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 9.2% 5.2%

Price change, 1 year +4.7% 0.0%

Total return, 1 year +14.8% +5.3%

Benchmark return, 1 year not published +14.8%

Ahead or behind not available −9.5 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 32% 40%

Age 3.3 years 2.3 years

Net assets, DYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 and LJUL as of Nov 4, 2026 $4.8m $9.0m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: DYLG vs LJUL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	DYLG	LJUL	DYLG	LJUL	DYLG	LJUL
3 months	−0.1%	+1.1%	0.8%	1.3%	not measured	+1.3 pts
6 months	+8.2%	+2.8%	1.8%	2.6%	not measured	−2.3 pts
1 year	+14.8%	+5.3%	9.2%	5.2%	not measured	−9.5 pts
3 years	+53.4%	–	31.6%	–	not measured	–
Since launchNot the same days: DYLG Jul 2023 · LJUL Jul 2024	+49.0%	+14.0%	31.3%	12.6%	not measured	−30.5 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

DYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.8%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 32% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

LJUL

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.5 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 40% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DYLG or LJUL?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting price in cash and LJUL paid 5.2%, so DYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or LJUL?: With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +14.8% and LJUL +5.3% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, DYLG or LJUL?: DYLG charges 0.35% a year and LJUL charges 0.79%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DYLG vs LJAN DYLG vs XIMR DYLG vs XISE DYLG vs TPAY LJUL vs PCOV LJUL vs ODTE LJUL vs TPAY LJUL vs LOCT

Where to next

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →DYLG on its own →LJUL on its own →DYLG dividend history →DYLG holdings →LJUL dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DYLG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DYLG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

DYLG 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Global X page for DYLG ↗

LJUL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

LJUL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

LJUL 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for LJUL ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DYLG against LJUL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-ljul

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.