Data as of .
DYLG vs FGSI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year DYLG paid 9.5% of its price in cash against FGSI’s 8.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and FGSI hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYLG | FGSI |
|---|---|---|
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.70% | 2.45% |
| NVIDIA CORP | 2.57% | 2.15% |
| Only in DYLG | Only in FGSI |
|---|---|
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 10.88% | Newmont Corporation 2.70% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 9.35% | Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.63% |
| AMGEN INC 4.46% | Marvell Technology, Inc. 2.53% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.35% | Arista Networks, Inc. 2.32% |
| TRAVELERS COS INC/THE 4.33% | DexCom, Inc. 2.28% |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 4.25% | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 2.22% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.04% | Target Corporation 2.22% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 4.04% | CME Group Inc. 2.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYLG | FGSI | DYLG | FGSI | DYLG | FGSI | |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +2.4% | 0.8% | 2.1% | +1.5 pts | +0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | +10.0% | 2.1% | 4.4% | −0.9 pts | −8.0 pts |
| 1 year | +13.8% | +5.3% | 9.5% | 8.1% | +0.3 pts | −11.3 pts |
| 3 years | +47.0% | not published | 30.8% | not published | −9.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +44.7% | +11.9% | 30.7% | 9.8% | −8.3 pts | −14.3 pts |
| DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on DIA, paying monthly | FGSI FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | First Trust |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 3.1% | 8.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.5% | 8.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +3.5% | −3.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +5.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.3 pts | −11.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 59% | not published |
| Age | 1150 days | 449 days |
| Net assets | $6m | $2m |
DYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
FGSI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DYLG or FGSI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting price in cash and FGSI paid 8.1%, so DYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or FGSI?
- With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +13.8% and FGSI returned +5.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DYLG or FGSI?
- DYLG charges 0.35% a year and FGSI charges 0.85%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYLG against FGSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-fgsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.