Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DUBS vs SDVD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year SDVD paid 9.2% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF and FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF.

2.3%DUBS cash paid, 1 year
9.2%SDVD cash paid, 1 year
+20.3%DUBS total return, 1 year
+10.8%SDVD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DUBS scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

DUBS 94SDVD 37.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DUBS3.7 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPY
SDVD16.4 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%SDVD+10.8%9.2% of it arrived as cash16.4 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%SDVD+10.8%16.4 pts behind SCHD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and SDVD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in DUBSOnly in SDVD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 74.61%National HealthCare Corporation 1.12%
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 25.28%First BanCorp. 1.04%
TREASURY BILL 0.11%OFG Bancorp 1.03%
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. 1.01%
Interparfums, Inc. 1.00%
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporat 1.00%
VeriSign, Inc. 1.00%
Assurant, Inc. 0.99%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DUBS and SDVD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DUBSSDVDDUBSSDVDDUBSSDVD
3 months+3.2%−0.1%0.5%2.1%+1.0 pts−6.7 pts
6 months+20.3%+8.3%1.2%4.4%+2.3 pts−4.3 pts
1 year+20.3%+10.8%2.3%9.2%+3.7 pts−16.4 pts
3 years+80.1%+53.0%9.1%30.7%+1.7 pts−0.7 pts
Since launch+84.4%+47.6%9.3%29.7%+2.4 pts−4.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DUBS and SDVD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
Option income on SPY, paying quarterly
SDVD
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
IssuerAptusFirst Trust
Strategyoption incomedividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized2.1%8.8%
Expense ratio0.40%0.85%
Cash paid, 1 year2.3%9.2%
Price change, 1 year+17.6%+1.2%
Total return, 1 year+20.3%+10.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+27.2%
Ahead or behind+3.7 pts−16.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1192 days1135 days
Net assets$353m$888m

DUBS in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 17.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.1%, paid quarterly.

SDVD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDVD paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DUBS or SDVD?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and SDVD paid 9.2%, so SDVD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or SDVD?
With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +20.3% and SDVD returned +10.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DUBS returned more.
Which is cheaper, DUBS or SDVD?
DUBS charges 0.40% a year and SDVD charges 0.85%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DUBS against SDVD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DUBS against SDVD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-sdvd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources