Which paid more, DUBS or MAGY?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 24.0%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or MAGY?

With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +18.6% and MAGY −1.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, DUBS or MAGY?

DUBS charges 0.40% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

DUBS vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DUBS and MAGY

Net assets: $398m on Jul 31, 2026 for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF, and $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

DUBS on its own →MAGY on its own →

At a glance

2.3%

DUBS cash paid, 1 year

24.0%

MAGY cash paid, 1 year

+18.6%

DUBS total return, 1 year

−1.5%

MAGY total return, 1 year

DUBS · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.8 pts ahead of SPY

DUBS

+18.6%

SPY

+14.8%

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

DUBS

+18.6%

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

DUBS

+18.6%

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

2.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY

−1.5%

MAGS

+6.3%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

24.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DUBS costs 0.59 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.1 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DUBS vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	DUBS	MAGY
Paid and earned
Measure	DUBS	MAGY
Total return, 1 year	+18.6%	−1.5%
Price change, 1 year	rose 16.0%	fell 26.1%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	71% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment	100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	DUBS	MAGY
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS
Cost and size
Measure	DUBS	MAGY
Expense ratio	0.40%	0.99%
Net assets, DUBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and MAGY as of Nov 4, 2026	$398m	$94m
Holdings
Measure	DUBS	MAGY
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · DUBS scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score97.9DUBS17.1MAGY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

DUBS 97.9

MAGY 17.1

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DUBS MAGY

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DUBS

State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 73.21%

BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 24.71%

Only in MAGY

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.12%

MAGS 11/06/2026 71.22 C -0.47%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF · Option income on SPY, paying quarterly MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF · Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly

Issuer Aptus Roundhill

Strategy option income covered call

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Magnificent Seven (MAGS)

Pays quarterly weekly

Payout rate, annualized 2.2% 25.1%

Expense ratio 0.40% 0.99%

Cash paid, 1 year 2.3% 24.0%

Price change, 1 year +16.0% −26.1%

Total return, 1 year +18.6% −1.5%

Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +6.3%

Ahead or behind +3.8 pts −7.8 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 71% 100%

Age 3.4 years 1.5 years

Net assets, DUBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and MAGY as of Nov 4, 2026 $398m $94m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: DUBS vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	DUBS	MAGY	DUBS	MAGY	DUBS	MAGY
3 months	+0.6%	+4.0%	0.6%	5.4%	+0.7 pts	+1.2 pts
6 months	+6.7%	+0.8%	1.1%	11.3%	+1.7 pts	−1.8 pts
1 year	+18.6%	−1.5%	2.3%	24.0%	+3.8 pts	−7.8 pts
3 years	+85.1%	–	9.9%	–	+2.2 pts	–
Since launchNot the same days: DUBS Jun 2023 · MAGY Apr 2025	+86.4%	+25.7%	10.2%	44.0%	+3.2 pts	−37.0 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

DUBS

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 16.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.2%, paid quarterly. Aptus estimates that 71% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MAGY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DUBS or MAGY?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 24.0%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or MAGY?: With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +18.6% and MAGY −1.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, DUBS or MAGY?: DUBS charges 0.40% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DUBS vs VAIE DUBS vs QVOL DUBS vs YLDE DUBS vs KYLD MAGY vs KHPI MAGY vs PBP MAGY vs IVVW MAGY vs XDTE

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →Magnificent Seven (MAGS) →DUBS on its own →MAGY on its own →DUBS dividend history →DUBS holdings →MAGY dividend history →MAGY holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DUBS filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DUBS prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

DUBS 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Aptus website ↗

MAGY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MAGY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

MAGY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Roundhill page for MAGY ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DUBS against MAGY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-magy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.