Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DUBS vs EGGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, EGGY paid 30.4% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DUBS and EGGY
Net assets: $398m on Jul 31, 2026 for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF, and $158m on Aug 31, 2026 for NestYield Dynamic Income ETF.
3.8 pts ahead of SPY
DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
DUBS
+18.6%
3.8 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
3.8 pts ahead of SPY
DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
DUBS
+18.6%
3.8 pts ahead of SPY
2.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.27.4 pts behind SPY
EGGY over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −37.9%, total −12.6%, SPY +14.8%, −27.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
EGGY
−12.6%
27.4 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
27.4 pts behind SPY
EGGY over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −37.9%, total −12.6%, SPY +14.8%, −27.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
EGGY
−12.6%
27.4 pts behind SPY
30.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. EGGY over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −37.9%, total −12.6%, SPY +14.8%, −27.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
DUBS costs 0.52 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 31.2 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DUBS | EGGY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.6% | −12.6% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 16.0% | fell 37.9% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 71% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment | 100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.92% |
| Net assets, DUBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and EGGY as of Aug 31, 2026 | $398m | $158m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Jan 3, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 95 weekly returns · each against SPYFrom Jan 2025 to Oct 2026, DUBS returned more: +35.1% to +12.9%. DUBS swung less: 14.8% to 30.8%. DUBS fell less at its worst: −16.4% to −32.5%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | DUBS | EGGY | SPY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +35.1% | +12.9% | DUBS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +17.9% | +6.9% | DUBS | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +29.9% | −35.3% | DUBS | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 14.8% | 30.8% | DUBS | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 9.8% | 23.3% | DUBS | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −16.4% | −32.5% | DUBS | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 103.0% | 183.0% | 100.0% | EGGY | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 97.7% | 144.2% | 100.0% | DUBS | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.98 | 1.33 | 1.00 | DUBS lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.99 | 0.42 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.92 | 0.24 | DUBS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 1.38 | 0.32 | DUBS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.139 | 0.056 | 0.116 | DUBS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 1.09 | 0.21 | DUBS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | SPY | SPY | SPY | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +2.3% a year | −7.9% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 1.75 | −0.45 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −0.3% to +4.9% | −42.6% to +26.8% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | 1.13 | −0.17 | DUBS | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 1.8% | 23.9% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 95 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and EGGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DUBS | EGGY | DUBS | EGGY | DUBS | EGGY |
| 3 months | +0.6% | −22.8% | 0.6% | 8.7% | +0.7 pts | −22.6 pts |
| 6 months | +6.7% | −27.0% | 1.1% | 15.7% | +1.7 pts | −32.0 pts |
| 1 year | +18.6% | −12.6% | 2.3% | 30.4% | +3.8 pts | −27.4 pts |
| 3 years | +85.1% | – | 9.9% | – | +2.2 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: DUBS Jun 2023 · EGGY Dec 2024 | +86.4% | +6.8% | 10.2% | 50.5% | +3.2 pts | −24.6 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
DUBS
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 16.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.2%, paid quarterly. Aptus estimates that 71% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
EGGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, EGGY paid 30.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 37.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −12.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 27.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 49.4%, paid monthly. Nest Egg estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DUBS against EGGY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-eggy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DUBS against EGGY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-eggy
[DUBS against EGGY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-eggy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.