Data as of .
DIVO vs XIJN: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XIJN paid 6.9% of its price in cash against DIVO’s 6.8%, though DIVO returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DIVO scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DIVO and XIJN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in DIVO | Only in XIJN |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.97% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.07 100.51% |
| Apple Inc 5.49% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 746.73 3.76% |
| Caterpillar Inc 5.34% | US Dollar 0.76% |
| Visa Inc 5.15% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.56% |
| Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/2031 5.02% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.56% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.90% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.55% |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 4.76% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.55% |
| Amgen Inc 4.74% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIVO | XIJN | DIVO | XIJN | DIVO | XIJN | |
| 3 months | +4.5% | +1.8% | 1.2% | 1.1% | +2.3 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +9.4% | +4.0% | 2.5% | 3.5% | −8.6 pts | −14.0 pts |
| 1 year | +14.6% | +6.2% | 6.8% | 6.9% | −2.0 pts | −10.3 pts |
| 3 years | +56.1% | not published | 19.1% | not published | −22.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +218.8% | +16.6% | 72.4% | 14.7% | −76.3 pts | −27.4 pts |
| DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SPY, paying monthly | XIJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | First Trust |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 4.9% | 6.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.56% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.8% | 6.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.3% | −0.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.6% | +6.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.0 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 3565 days | 816 days |
| Net assets | $7.8bn | $53m |
DIVO in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DIVO paid 6.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.9%, paid monthly.
XIJN in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIJN paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DIVO or XIJN?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DIVO paid 6.8% of its starting price in cash and XIJN paid 6.9%, so XIJN paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DIVO or XIJN?
- With every distribution reinvested, DIVO returned +14.6% and XIJN returned +6.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DIVO returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DIVO or XIJN?
- DIVO charges 0.56% a year and XIJN charges 0.85%, so DIVO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIVO against XIJN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/divo-vs-xijn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.