Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

DDDD vs LAPR: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

DDDD and LAPR both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DDDD and LAPR

Net assets: $7.8m on Nov 3, 2026 for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF, and $11m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April.

At a glance
3.4%
DDDD cash paid, since launch, Mar 12, 2026
6.2%
LAPR cash paid, 1 year
+17.1%
DDDD total return, since launch, Mar 12, 2026
+6.2%
LAPR total return, 1 year
DDDD · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 3.3 pts behind SCHD
DDDD
+17.1%
SCHD
+20.4%

3.3 pts behind SCHD

DDDD since launch: paid 3.4%, price +13.4%, total +17.1%, SCHD +20.4%, −3.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SCHD

+20.4%

DDDD

+17.1%

3.4% as cash

3.3 pts behind SCHD

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.3 pts behind SCHD

DDDD since launch: paid 3.4%, price +13.4%, total +17.1%, SCHD +20.4%, −3.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SCHD

+20.4%

DDDD

+17.1%

3.3 pts behind SCHD

3.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DDDD since launch: paid 3.4%, price +13.4%, total +17.1%, SCHD +20.4%, −3.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LAPR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.6 pts behind VOO
LAPR
+6.2%
VOO
+14.8%

8.6 pts behind VOO

LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.1%, total +6.2%, VOO +14.8%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LAPR

+6.2%

6.2% of it arrived as cash

8.6 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.6 pts behind VOO

LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.1%, total +6.2%, VOO +14.8%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LAPR

+6.2%

8.6 pts behind VOO

6.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.1%, total +6.2%, VOO +14.8%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

LAPR costs 0.22 points a year less; LAPR is 1.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DDDD vs LAPR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureDDDDLAPR
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+6.2%
Price changerose 13.4% (since Mar 12, 2026)fell 0.1% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate76% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment57% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkUS dividend stocks, measured through SCHDVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOO
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.01%0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$7.8m$11m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, DDDD and LAPR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DDDD LAPR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DDDD
Texas Instruments Inc 4.70%
Procter & Gamble Co 4.37%
Home Depot Inc 4.29%
Coca-Cola Co 4.18%
Amgen Inc 4.16%
Abbott Laboratories 4.02%
Chevron Corp 3.94%
QUALCOMM Inc 3.92%
Only in LAPR
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF · Synthetic covered call on SCHD LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly
Strategy synthetic covered call buffer with income
Benchmark US dividend stocks (SCHD) Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 18.3% 6.7%
Expense ratio 1.01% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.4% (since launch, Mar 12, 2026) 6.2%
Price change, 1 year +13.4% (since launch, Mar 12, 2026) −0.1%
Total return, 1 year +17.1% (since launch, Mar 12, 2026) +6.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year +20.4% (since launch, Mar 12, 2026) +14.8%
Ahead or behind −3.3 pts (since launch, Mar 12, 2026) −8.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 76% 57%
Age 237 days 2.6 years
Net assets, DDDD as of Nov 3, 2026 and LAPR as of Nov 4, 2026 $7.8m $11m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: DDDD vs LAPR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowDDDDLAPRDDDDLAPRDDDDLAPR
3 months+7.5%+1.0%1.6%1.7%−1.0 pts+1.1 pts
6 months+13.6%+2.4%3.3%3.3%−2.6 pts−2.6 pts
1 year–+6.2%–6.2%–−8.6 pts
Since launchNot the same days: DDDD Mar 2026 · LAPR Apr 2024+17.1%+16.8%3.4%15.0%−3.3 pts−34.6 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

DDDD and LAPR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DDDD

Over the period from its first trade on Mar 12, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, DDDD paid 3.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 13.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.1%. US dividend stocks (SCHD) returned +20.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.3%, paid periodically. YieldMax estimates that 76% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

LAPR

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LAPR paid 6.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 57% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, DDDD or LAPR?
DDDD charges 1.01% a year and LAPR charges 0.79%, so LAPR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DDDD against LAPR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dddd-vs-lapr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.