Data as of .
CVRD vs XIMR: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year CVRD paid 7.4% of its price in cash against XIMR’s 6.7%, though XIMR returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XIMR scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CVRD and XIMR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CVRD | Only in XIMR |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks Inc 4.84% | 2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.06 114.57% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 4.58% | 2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 648.56 1.15% |
| Danaher Corp 4.32% | US Dollar 0.78% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.06% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.60% |
| Agilent Technologies Inc 3.98% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.60% |
| Microsoft Corp 3.88% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.59% |
| Visa Inc 3.68% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.59% |
| Broadcom Inc 3.57% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVRD | XIMR | CVRD | XIMR | CVRD | XIMR | |
| 3 months | +4.0% | +1.5% | 1.7% | 1.8% | +1.7 pts | −0.8 pts |
| 6 months | +5.7% | +5.0% | 3.3% | 3.1% | −12.3 pts | −13.1 pts |
| 1 year | +5.6% | +7.5% | 7.4% | 6.7% | −11.0 pts | −9.1 pts |
| 3 years | +19.5% | not published | 25.9% | not published | −58.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +21.1% | +19.2% | 26.3% | 16.2% | −59.8 pts | −32.9 pts |
| CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF Covered call on SPY, paying quarterly | XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Madison | First Trust |
| Strategy | covered call | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.5% | 7.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.92% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 7.4% | 6.7% |
| Price change, 1 year | −2.2% | +0.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.6% | +7.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −11.0 pts | −9.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1123 days | 913 days |
| Net assets | $32m | $27m |
CVRD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CVRD paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly.
XIMR in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIMR paid 6.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, CVRD or XIMR?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CVRD paid 7.4% of its starting price in cash and XIMR paid 6.7%, so CVRD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, CVRD or XIMR?
- With every distribution reinvested, CVRD returned +5.6% and XIMR returned +7.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XIMR returned more.
- Which is cheaper, CVRD or XIMR?
- CVRD charges 0.92% a year and XIMR charges 0.85%, so XIMR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CVRD against XIMR, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cvrd-vs-ximr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.