Which is cheaper, CDPI or JANH?

CDPI charges 0.45% a year and JANH charges 0.79%, so CDPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

CDPI vs JANH: Dividend Yield & Total Return

CDPI and JANH both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

Net assets: $12m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January, beside Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF.

CDPI on its own →JANH on its own →

At a glance

1.5%

CDPI cash paid, since launch, Jul 14, 2026

6.2%

JANH cash paid, 1 year

+1.6%

CDPI total return, since launch, Jul 14, 2026

+6.5%

JANH total return, 1 year

CDPI · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured

CDPI

+1.6%

none

Not measured

CDPI since launch: paid 1.5%, price +0.1%, total +1.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

CDPI

+1.6%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

CDPI since launch: paid 1.5%, price +0.1%, total +1.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

CDPI

+1.6%

1.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CDPI since launch: paid 1.5%, price +0.1%, total +1.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

JANH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH

+6.5%

SPY

+14.8%

8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JANH

+6.5%

6.2% of it arrived as cash

8.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JANH

+6.5%

8.3 pts behind SPY

6.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CDPI costs 0.34 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CDPI vs JANH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	CDPI	JANH
Paid and earned
Measure	CDPI	JANH
Total return, 1 year	not published	+6.5%
Price change	rose 0.1% (since Jul 14, 2026)	rose 0.1% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate	76% of the Oct 5, 2026 payment	50% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	CDPI	JANH
Benchmark	not published	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Measure	CDPI	JANH
Expense ratio	0.45%	0.79%
Net assets	not read by ETFIQ	$12m
Holdings
Measure	CDPI	JANH
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Side by side

CDPI Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF · Covered call, paying monthly JANH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly

Issuer Columbia Innovator

Strategy covered call defined income

Benchmark none S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays monthly quarterly

Payout rate, annualized 8.0% 6.2%

Expense ratio 0.45% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 1.5% (since launch, Jul 14, 2026) 6.2%

Price change, 1 year +0.1% (since launch, Jul 14, 2026) +0.1%

Total return, 1 year +1.6% (since launch, Jul 14, 2026) +6.5%

Benchmark return, 1 year not published +14.8%

Ahead or behind not available −8.3 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 76% 50%

Age 113 days 2.8 years

Net assets not read by ETFIQ $12m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: CDPI vs JANH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	CDPI	JANH	CDPI	JANH	CDPI	JANH
3 months	+0.4%	+1.3%	1.5%	1.6%	not measured	+1.4 pts
6 months	–	+3.3%	–	3.1%	–	−1.7 pts
1 year	–	+6.5%	–	6.2%	–	−8.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: CDPI Jul 2026 · JANH Jan 2024	+1.6%	+20.6%	1.5%	17.7%	not measured	−47.0 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

CDPI

Over the period from its first trade on Jul 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, CDPI paid 1.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid monthly. Columbia estimates that 76% of the distribution paid Oct 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

JANH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANH paid 6.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 50% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CDPI or JANH?: CDPI charges 0.45% a year and JANH charges 0.79%, so CDPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CDPI vs JULJ CDPI vs JANJ CDPI vs OCTJ CDPI vs OCTH JANH vs CVRD JANH vs DDDD JANH vs DOGG JANH vs FDND

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →CDPI on its own →JANH on its own →CDPI dividend history →JANH dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CDPI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CDPI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

CDPI 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Columbia website ↗

JANH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

JANH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

JANH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for JANH ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CDPI against JANH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cdpi-vs-janh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.