Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CAIQ vs ODTE: which paid, and which earned it?

CAIQ and ODTE both write options for income.

Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF and VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF.

13.7%CAIQ cash paid, 1 year
6.7%ODTE cash paid, 1 year
+16.7%CAIQ total return, 1 year
+6.2%ODTE total return, 1 year
CAIQ7 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% of it arrived as cash7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% cash7 pts behind QQQ
ODTE10.5 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.7%ODTE+6.2%6.7% as cash10.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.7%ODTE+6.2%10.5 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CAIQ and ODTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in CAIQOnly in ODTE
Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF 100.00%Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF 33.70%
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 33.27%
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF 33.03%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

CAIQ and ODTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CAIQODTECAIQODTECAIQODTE
3 months−0.5%−4.8%4.3%3.4%+1.9 pts−7.0 pts
6 months+16.5%not published9.5%not published−7.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+16.7%+6.2%13.7%6.7%−7.0 pts−10.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CAIQ and ODTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAIQ
Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
ODTE
VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerCalamosVegaShares
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized17.9%14.1%
Expense ratio0.74%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year13.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)6.7% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+2.1%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year+16.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)+6.2% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.6%+16.7%
Ahead or behind−7.0 pts−10.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age302 days169 days
Net assets$167m$3m

CAIQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.9%, paid monthly.

ODTE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 2, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ODTE paid 6.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.1%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CAIQ or ODTE?
CAIQ charges 0.74% a year and ODTE charges 0.68%, so ODTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CAIQ against ODTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAIQ against ODTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-odte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources