Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CAIQ vs GPIQ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
CAIQ and GPIQ both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CAIQ and GPIQ
Net assets: $286m on Jul 31, 2026 for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF, and $6.4bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF.
5.7 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ since launch: paid 16.8%, price −4.1%, total +13.0%, QQQ +18.7%, −5.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+18.7%
CAIQ
+13.0%
16.8% of it arrived as cash
5.7 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
5.7 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ since launch: paid 16.8%, price −4.1%, total +13.0%, QQQ +18.7%, −5.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+18.7%
CAIQ
+13.0%
16.8% as cash
5.7 pts behind QQQ
16.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CAIQ since launch: paid 16.8%, price −4.1%, total +13.0%, QQQ +18.7%, −5.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.0.7 pts ahead of QQQ
GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.9%, price +1.7%, total +13.0%, QQQ +12.3%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
GPIQ
+13.0%
10.9% of it arrived as cash
0.7 pts ahead of QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
0.7 pts ahead of QQQ
GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.9%, price +1.7%, total +13.0%, QQQ +12.3%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
GPIQ
+13.0%
10.9% cash
0.7 pts ahead of QQQ
10.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.9%, price +1.7%, total +13.0%, QQQ +12.3%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
GPIQ costs 0.45 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CAIQ | GPIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +13.0% |
| Price change | fell 4.1% (since Nov 20, 2025) | rose 1.7% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 9, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, CAIQ as of Jul 31, 2026 and GPIQ as of Nov 3, 2026 | $286m | $6.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
Nov 28, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 48 weekly returnsFrom Nov 2025 to Oct 2026, GPIQ returned more: +12.1% to +8.5%. GPIQ fell slightly less at its worst: −7.9% to −8.1%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CAIQ | GPIQ | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +8.5% | +12.1% | GPIQ | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −6.4% | +1.8% | GPIQ | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −8.1% | −7.9% | GPIQ (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 48 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CAIQ and GPIQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CAIQ | GPIQ | CAIQ | GPIQ | CAIQ | GPIQ |
| 3 months | −2.9% | −2.6% | 4.5% | 2.6% | +0.6 pts | +0.8 pts |
| 6 months | −1.9% | +0.5% | 8.6% | 5.3% | −1.6 pts | +0.9 pts |
| 1 year | – | +13.0% | – | 10.9% | – | +0.7 pts |
| 3 years | – | +80.0% | – | 38.3% | – | −11.4 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: CAIQ Nov 2025 · GPIQ Oct 2023 | +13.0% | +91.4% | 16.8% | 40.7% | −5.7 pts | −13.4 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for CAIQ.
CAIQ
Over the period from its first trade on Nov 20, 2025 to Nov 4, 2026, CAIQ paid 16.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +18.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.6%, paid monthly. Calamos estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 9, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
GPIQ
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CAIQ against GPIQ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-gpiq
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CAIQ against GPIQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-gpiq
[CAIQ against GPIQ (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-gpiq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.