Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CAIQ vs EGGY: which paid, and which earned it?

CAIQ and EGGY both write options for income.

Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF and NestYield Dynamic Income ETF.

13.7%CAIQ cash paid, 1 year
28.1%EGGY cash paid, 1 year
+16.7%CAIQ total return, 1 year
+15.3%EGGY total return, 1 year
CAIQ7 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% of it arrived as cash7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% cash7 pts behind QQQ
EGGY1.2 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%EGGY+15.3%28.1% of it arrived as cash1.2 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%EGGY+15.3%28.1% cash1.2 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CAIQ and EGGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in CAIQOnly in EGGY
Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF 100.00%Seagate Technology Holdings PL 12.31%
Bloom Energy Corp 10.77%
Micron Technology Inc 7.95%
Lumentum Holdings Inc 6.86%
Astera Labs Inc 6.85%
Coherent Corp 5.81%
Vertiv Holdings Co 5.60%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.86%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

CAIQ and EGGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CAIQEGGYCAIQEGGYCAIQEGGY
3 months−0.5%−15.1%4.3%7.1%+1.9 pts−17.3 pts
6 months+16.5%+27.6%9.5%19.4%−7.7 pts+9.6 pts
1 yearnot published+15.3%not published28.1%not published−1.2 pts
Since launch+16.7%+42.3%13.7%45.5%−7.0 pts+11.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CAIQ and EGGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAIQ
Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
EGGY
NestYield Dynamic Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerCalamosNest Egg
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized17.9%34.8%
Expense ratio0.74%0.92%
Cash paid, 1 year13.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)28.1%
Price change, 1 year+2.1%−16.2%
Total return, 1 year+16.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)+15.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−7.0 pts−1.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age302 days630 days
Net assets$167m$126m

CAIQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.9%, paid monthly.

EGGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, EGGY paid 28.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 16.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CAIQ or EGGY?
CAIQ charges 0.74% a year and EGGY charges 0.92%, so CAIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CAIQ against EGGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAIQ against EGGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-eggy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources