Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BUCK vs LTTI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year LTTI paid 8.4% of its price in cash against BUCK’s 6.9%, though BUCK returned more with it reinvested.

Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF and FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF.

6.9%BUCK cash paid, 1 year
8.4%LTTI cash paid, 1 year
+4.9%BUCK total return, 1 year
−4.5%LTTI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BUCK scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BUCK 72.8LTTI 46.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BUCK9.6 pts ahead of TLT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
TLT−4.7%BUCK+4.9%6.9% of it arrived as cash9.6 pts ahead of TLTTotal return, distributions reinvestedTLT−4.7%BUCK+4.9%6.9% cash9.6 pts ahead of TLT
LTTIAbout even with TLT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
TLT−4.7%LTTI−4.5%about even with TLTTotal return, distributions reinvestedTLT−4.7%LTTI−4.5%about even with TLT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BUCK and LTTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BUCKOnly in LTTI
SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 100.00%2026-10-30 iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF C 0.82 98.49%
US Dollar 0.85%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 09/29/2026 0.38%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.38%
2026-09-25 iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF C 81.24 -0.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BUCK and LTTI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BUCKLTTIBUCKLTTIBUCKLTTI
3 months+1.1%−3.8%1.5%2.2%+6.3 pts+1.4 pts
6 months+2.4%−2.8%3.2%4.4%+5.5 pts+0.3 pts
1 year+4.9%−4.5%6.9%8.4%+9.6 pts+0.2 pts
3 years+16.4%not published21.6%not published+17.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+21.1%−2.1%25.4%12.9%+23.1 pts−0.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BUCK and LTTI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
Option income on TLT, paying monthly
LTTI
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
Option income on TLT, paying monthly
IssuerSimplifyFirst Trust
Strategyoption incomeoption income
Benchmark20+ Year Treasury (TLT)20+ Year Treasury (TLT)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.2%9.3%
Expense ratio0.35%0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year6.9%8.4%
Price change, 1 year−2.2%−12.6%
Total return, 1 year+4.9%−4.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year−4.7%−4.7%
Ahead or behind+9.6 pts+0.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1421 days582 days
Net assets$510m$15m

BUCK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BUCK paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −4.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 9.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid monthly.

LTTI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LTTI paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −4.5%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −4.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BUCK or LTTI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BUCK paid 6.9% of its starting price in cash and LTTI paid 8.4%, so LTTI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BUCK or LTTI?
With every distribution reinvested, BUCK returned +4.9% and LTTI returned −4.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BUCK returned more.
Which is cheaper, BUCK or LTTI?
BUCK charges 0.35% a year and LTTI charges 0.65%, so BUCK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BUCK against LTTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BUCK against LTTI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/buck-vs-ltti Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources