Data as of .
BTCI vs EHY: which paid, and which earned it?
BTCI and EHY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BTCI and EHY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BTCI | Only in EHY |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury Bill 78.13% | Cash & Other 56.28% |
| iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 14.10% | ETHA 12/18/2026 15.75 C 29.96% |
| VanEck Bitcoin ETF/US 7.77% | United States Treasury Bill 11/27/2026 17.81% |
| Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 2.89% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/24/2026 1.05% | |
| ETHA 12/18/2026 15.75 P -3.43% | |
| ETHA 09/22/2026 19.44 C -4.56% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTCI | EHY | BTCI | EHY | BTCI | EHY | |
| 3 months | +22.3% | +30.3% | 7.0% | 12.8% | −6.9 pts | −24.4 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +1.3% | 12.7% | 20.9% | −3.8 pts | −22.4 pts |
| 1 year | −29.1% | not published | 18.6% | not published | +2.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +15.5% | −44.5% | 54.4% | 20.5% | −5.5 pts | −5.3 pts |
| BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF Option income on IBIT, paying monthly | EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF Covered call on ETHA, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | Amplify |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Ether (ETHA) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 26.3% | 48.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.75% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 18.6% | 20.5% (since launch on Oct 9, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −47.0% | −63.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | −29.1% | −44.5% (since launch on Oct 9, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −31.1% | −39.3% |
| Ahead or behind | +2.0 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 94% | not published |
| Age | 701 days | 344 days |
| Net assets | $1.3bn | $5m |
BTCI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCI paid 18.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 47.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −29.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 26.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
EHY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Oct 9, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, EHY paid 20.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 63.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −44.5%. Ether (ETHA) returned −39.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 48.4%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, BTCI or EHY?
- BTCI charges 0.99% a year and EHY charges 0.75%, so EHY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BTCI against EHY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/btci-vs-ehy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.