Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BITA vs BTCI: which paid, and which earned it?

BITA and BTCI both write options for income.

iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF.

3.7%BITA cash paid, 1 year
18.6%BTCI cash paid, 1 year
+21.0%BITA total return, 1 year
−29.1%BTCI total return, 1 year
BITA2.8 pts behind IBIT · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT+23.8%BITA+21.0%2.8 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT+23.8%BITA+21.0%2.8 pts behind IBIT
BTCI2 pts ahead of IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BTCI−29.1%2 pts ahead of IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BTCI−29.1%2 pts ahead of IBIT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BITA and BTCI hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BITA and BTCI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBITABTCI
ISHARES BITCOIN TRUST ETF CL132.88%14.10%
Only in each
Only in BITAOnly in BTCI
BITCOIN 67.78%United States Treasury Bill 78.13%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.07%VanEck Bitcoin ETF/US 7.77%
SEP26 IBIT C @ 45.000000 -0.04%
OCT26 IBIT C @ 45.000000 -0.13%
OCT26 IBIT C @ 44.000000 -0.15%
SEP26 IBIT C @ 41.000000 -0.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 17, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BITA and BTCI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BITABTCIBITABTCIBITABTCI
3 months+24.6%+22.3%3.9%7.0%−4.6 pts−6.9 pts
6 monthsnot published+11.9%not published12.7%not published−3.8 pts
1 yearnot published−29.1%not published18.6%not published+2.0 pts
Since launch+21.0%+15.5%3.7%54.4%−2.8 pts−5.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BITA and BTCI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BITA
iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
Option income on IBIT, paying monthly
IssueriSharesNEOS
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Bitcoin (IBIT)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized12.8%26.3%
Expense rationot published0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year3.7% (since launch on Jun 16, 2026)18.6%
Price change, 1 year+16.6%−47.0%
Total return, 1 year+21.0% (since launch on Jun 16, 2026)−29.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.8%−31.1%
Ahead or behind−2.8 pts+2.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published94%
Age94 days701 days
Net assets$87m$1.3bn

BITA in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jun 16, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, BITA paid 3.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 16.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.0%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned +23.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.8%, paid monthly.

BTCI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCI paid 18.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 47.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −29.1%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 26.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BITA against BTCI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITA against BTCI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bita-vs-btci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources