Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BALQ vs OCTJ: which paid, and which earned it?

BALQ and OCTJ both write options for income.

iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October.

8.5%BALQ cash paid, 1 year
5.2%OCTJ cash paid, 1 year
+21.4%BALQ total return, 1 year
+5.5%OCTJ total return, 1 year
BALQ5.3 pts ahead of QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+16.1%BALQ+21.4%8.5% of it arrived as cash5.3 pts ahead of QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+16.1%BALQ+21.4%5.3 pts ahead of QQQ
OCTJ11.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%OCTJ+5.5%5.2% as cash11.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%OCTJ+5.5%11.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BALQ and OCTJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BALQOnly in OCTJ
NVIDIA 8.62%TREASURY BILL 98.69%
APPLE 7.63%TREASURY BILL 1.31%
MICROSOFT 6.72%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 5.06%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.76%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.31%
ALPHABET CLASS A 3.44%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BALQ and OCTJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BALQOCTJBALQOCTJBALQOCTJ
3 months−0.5%+1.1%2.8%1.3%+1.9 pts−1.1 pts
6 months+27.2%+4.0%6.5%2.7%+3.0 pts−14.1 pts
1 yearnot published+5.5%not published5.2%not published−11.1 pts
Since launch+21.4%+18.9%8.5%15.9%+5.3 pts−66.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BALQ and OCTJ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BALQ
iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
OCTJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssueriSharesInnovator
Strategycovered calldefined income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized8.9%5.3%
Expense ratio0.35%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year8.5% (since launch on Dec 3, 2025)5.2%
Price change, 1 year+11.9%+0.1%
Total return, 1 year+21.4% (since launch on Dec 3, 2025)+5.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.1%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+5.3 pts−11.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age289 days1082 days
Net assets$29m$15m

BALQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Dec 3, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, BALQ paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +16.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.9%, paid monthly.

OCTJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTJ paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, BALQ or OCTJ?
BALQ charges 0.35% a year and OCTJ charges 0.79%, so BALQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BALQ against OCTJ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BALQ against OCTJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/balq-vs-octj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources