Data as of .
BALQ vs FTHI: which paid, and which earned it?
BALQ and FTHI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BALQ and FTHI hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | BALQ | FTHI |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE | 7.63% | 7.75% |
| NVIDIA | 8.62% | 6.90% |
| MICROSOFT | 6.72% | 2.94% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 4.76% | 2.53% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A | 3.44% | 2.41% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.99% | 2.01% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C | 3.09% | 1.74% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 2.61% | 1.74% |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A | 3.31% | 1.31% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 2.15% | 1.26% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY | 5.06% | 1.10% |
| TESLA INC | 2.73% | 0.97% |
| Only in BALQ | Only in FTHI |
|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 2.70% | US Dollar 5.90% |
| LAM RESEARCH 1.94% | JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.67% |
| CASH COLLATERAL MSFUT USD 1.46% | Bank of America Corporation 2.22% |
| MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 1.04% | ASML Holding N.V. (New York Registry Shares) 2.17% |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 0.85% | Amgen Inc. 1.37% |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 0.83% | Gilead Sciences, Inc. 1.27% |
| SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 0.82% | Fortinet, Inc. 1.25% |
| ADOBE INC 0.68% | Johnson & Johnson 1.11% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALQ | FTHI | BALQ | FTHI | BALQ | FTHI | |
| 3 months | −0.5% | +1.7% | 2.8% | 2.2% | +1.9 pts | −0.6 pts |
| 6 months | +27.2% | +9.8% | 6.5% | 4.6% | +3.0 pts | −8.2 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +9.7% | not published | 8.9% | not published | −6.9 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +47.9% | not published | 28.9% | not published | −30.5 pts |
| Since launch | +21.4% | +156.3% | 8.5% | 82.6% | +5.3 pts | −257.8 pts |
| BALQ iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | First Trust |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.9% | 9.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.5% (since launch on Dec 3, 2025) | 8.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | +11.9% | +0.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.4% (since launch on Dec 3, 2025) | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.1% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.3 pts | −6.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 289 days | 4637 days |
| Net assets | $29m | $2.5bn |
BALQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 3, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, BALQ paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +16.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.9%, paid monthly.
FTHI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTHI paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, BALQ or FTHI?
- BALQ charges 0.35% a year and FTHI charges 0.75%, so BALQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BALQ against FTHI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/balq-vs-fthi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.