Data as of .
BALI vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year YMAG paid 35.5% of its price in cash against BALI’s 8.5%, though BALI returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BALI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BALI and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BALI | Only in YMAG |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA 7.36% | YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 14.58% |
| APPLE 6.15% | YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.24% |
| MICROSOFT 5.07% | YieldMax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.21% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.29% | YieldMax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.11% |
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 2.91% | YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.11% |
| ALPHABET CLASS A 2.70% | YieldMax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.99% |
| ALPHABET CLASS C 2.38% | YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 13.90% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.25% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALI | YMAG | BALI | YMAG | BALI | YMAG | |
| 3 months | +4.0% | +6.1% | 2.0% | 9.4% | +1.8 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +17.3% | +15.4% | 4.7% | 21.1% | −0.8 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | +18.5% | +9.7% | 8.5% | 35.5% | +2.0 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +76.3% | +70.7% | 29.2% | 89.1% | −8.0 pts | −34.1 pts |
| BALI iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 7.5% | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.5% | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.2% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.5% | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | +2.0 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 1086 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $1.5bn | $297m |
BALI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BALI paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.5%, paid monthly.
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, BALI or YMAG?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BALI paid 8.5% of its starting price in cash and YMAG paid 35.5%, so YMAG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, BALI or YMAG?
- With every distribution reinvested, BALI returned +18.5% and YMAG returned +9.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BALI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, BALI or YMAG?
- BALI charges 0.35% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so BALI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BALI against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bali-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.