Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BALI vs GPIX: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year GPIX paid 8.8% of its price in cash against BALI’s 8.5%, though BALI returned more with it reinvested.

iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

8.5%BALI cash paid, 1 year
8.8%GPIX cash paid, 1 year
+18.9%BALI total return, 1 year
+17.5%GPIX total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BALI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BALI 86.1GPIX 79.53.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BALI1.4 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
SPY+17.5%BALI+18.9%8.5% of it arrived as cash1.4 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+17.5%BALI+18.9%1.4 pts ahead of SPY
GPIXAbout even with SPY · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
SPY+17.5%GPIX+17.5%8.8% of it arrived as cashabout even with SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+17.5%GPIX+17.5%about even with SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BALI and GPIX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BALI and GPIX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBALIGPIX
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC0.39%0.34%
LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES CLASS A0.19%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BALIOnly in GPIX
NVIDIA 7.38%NVIDIA CORP 7.33%
APPLE 6.04%APPLE INC 6.47%
MICROSOFT 5.32%ALPHABET INC 4.37%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.35%MICROSOFT CORP 3.90%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.52%AMAZON.COM INC 3.39%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 2.46%BROADCOM INC 2.80%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.33%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.02%
BROADCOM INC 2.23%TESLA INC 1.89%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BALI and GPIX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BALIGPIXBALIGPIXBALIGPIX
3 months+4.4%+3.4%2.0%2.1%+1.1 pts+0.1 pts
6 months+15.0%+14.6%4.7%4.6%−1.0 pts−1.4 pts
1 year+18.9%+17.5%8.5%8.8%+1.4 pts0.0 pts
Since launch+76.3%+80.5%29.2%30.5%−8.2 pts−11.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BALI and GPIX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BALI
iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssueriSharesGoldman Sachs
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized7.5%8.6%
Expense ratio0.35%0.29%
Cash paid, 1 year8.5%8.8%
Price change, 1 year+9.5%+7.9%
Total return, 1 year+18.9%+17.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+17.5%+17.5%
Ahead or behind+1.4 pts0.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1079 days1051 days

BALI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, BALI paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.5%, paid monthly.

GPIX in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GPIX paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BALI or GPIX?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, BALI paid 8.5% of its starting price in cash and GPIX paid 8.8%, so GPIX paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BALI or GPIX?
With every distribution reinvested, BALI returned +18.9% and GPIX returned +17.5% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so BALI returned more.
Which is cheaper, BALI or GPIX?
BALI charges 0.35% a year and GPIX charges 0.29%, so GPIX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BALI against GPIX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BALI against GPIX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bali-vs-gpix Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources