Data as of .
APRJ vs PBP: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year PBP paid 11.8% of its price in cash against APRJ’s 5.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: PBP scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, APRJ and PBP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in APRJ | Only in PBP |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 95.06% | NVIDIA Corp 8.18% |
| TREASURY BILL 1.66% | Apple Inc 7.50% |
| TREASURY BILL 1.65% | Microsoft Corp 5.57% |
| TREASURY BILL 1.64% | Amazon.com Inc 3.77% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.11% | |
| Broadcom Inc 2.57% | |
| Alphabet Inc 2.47% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.22% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APRJ | PBP | APRJ | PBP | APRJ | PBP | |
| 3 months | +1.3% | +5.0% | 1.7% | 2.8% | −1.0 pts | +2.7 pts |
| 6 months | +3.8% | +13.0% | 3.0% | 5.7% | −14.2 pts | −5.0 pts |
| 1 year | +6.0% | +18.5% | 5.7% | 11.8% | −10.5 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 3 years | +19.3% | +46.1% | 17.4% | 31.8% | −59.1 pts | −32.3 pts |
| Since launch | +23.7% | +199.0% | 19.4% | 101.2% | −69.9 pts | −604.5 pts |
| APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Innovator | Invesco |
| Strategy | defined income | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.8% | 11.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.29% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.7% | 11.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | +0.1% | +5.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.0% | +18.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −10.5 pts | +1.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1264 days | 6101 days |
| Net assets | $31m | $386m |
APRJ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, APRJ paid 5.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid quarterly.
PBP in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, APRJ or PBP?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, APRJ paid 5.7% of its starting price in cash and PBP paid 11.8%, so PBP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, APRJ or PBP?
- With every distribution reinvested, APRJ returned +6.0% and PBP returned +18.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so PBP returned more.
- Which is cheaper, APRJ or PBP?
- APRJ charges 0.79% a year and PBP charges 0.29%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, APRJ against PBP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprj-vs-pbp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.