Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

APRH vs XYLG: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XYLG paid 13.2% of its price in cash against APRH’s 5.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

5.9%APRH cash paid, 1 year
13.2%XYLG cash paid, 1 year
+6.5%APRH total return, 1 year
+17.2%XYLG total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XYLG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

APRH 46XYLG 733.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

APRH10.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%APRH+6.5%5.9% of it arrived as cash10.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%APRH+6.5%10.1 pts behind SPY
XYLG0.7 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XYLG+17.2%13.2% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XYLG+17.2%13.2% as cash0.7 pts ahead of SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, APRH and XYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in APRHOnly in XYLG
TREASURY BILL 94.03%NVIDIA CORP 8.20%
TREASURY BILL 2.00%APPLE INC 7.50%
TREASURY BILL 1.99%MICROSOFT CORP 5.59%
TREASURY BILL 1.98%AMAZON.COM INC 3.81%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.12%
BROADCOM INC 2.59%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.48%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

APRH and XYLG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
APRHXYLGAPRHXYLGAPRHXYLG
3 months+1.3%+3.6%2.1%1.3%−0.9 pts+1.3 pts
6 months+5.1%+15.7%3.7%3.0%−12.9 pts−2.3 pts
1 year+6.5%+17.2%5.9%13.2%−10.1 pts+0.7 pts
3 years+22.5%+60.9%19.7%43.0%−55.9 pts−17.5 pts
Since launch+28.3%+114.0%22.2%69.0%−65.3 pts−38.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
APRH and XYLG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APRH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorGlobal X
Strategydefined incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.3%4.4%
Expense ratio0.79%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year5.9%13.2%
Price change, 1 year+0.3%+2.6%
Total return, 1 year+6.5%+17.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−10.1 pts+0.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published80%
Age1264 days2188 days
Net assets$25m$65m

APRH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, APRH paid 5.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.3%, paid quarterly.

XYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XYLG paid 13.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APRH or XYLG?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, APRH paid 5.9% of its starting price in cash and XYLG paid 13.2%, so XYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APRH or XYLG?
With every distribution reinvested, APRH returned +6.5% and XYLG returned +17.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XYLG returned more.
Which is cheaper, APRH or XYLG?
APRH charges 0.79% a year and XYLG charges 0.35%, so XYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

APRH against XYLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APRH against XYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprh-vs-xylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources