Data as of .
APRH vs LOCT: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year APRH paid 5.9% of its price in cash against LOCT’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: APRH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, APRH and LOCT hold 94% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | APRH | LOCT |
|---|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL | 94.03% | 98.30% |
| Only in APRH | Only in LOCT |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 2.00% | TREASURY BILL 0.43% |
| TREASURY BILL 1.99% | TREASURY BILL 0.43% |
| TREASURY BILL 1.98% | TREASURY BILL 0.42% |
| TREASURY BILL 0.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APRH | LOCT | APRH | LOCT | APRH | LOCT | |
| 3 months | +1.3% | +1.0% | 2.1% | 1.3% | −0.9 pts | −1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +5.1% | +3.9% | 3.7% | 2.6% | −12.9 pts | −14.1 pts |
| 1 year | +6.5% | +5.4% | 5.9% | 5.2% | −10.1 pts | −11.2 pts |
| 3 years | +22.5% | not published | 19.7% | not published | −55.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +28.3% | +18.5% | 22.2% | 16.5% | −65.3 pts | −66.4 pts |
| APRH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | LOCT Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Innovator | Innovator |
| Strategy | defined income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.3% | 5.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.9% | 5.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | +0.3% | +0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.5% | +5.4% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −10.1 pts | −11.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1264 days | 1082 days |
| Net assets | $25m | $11m |
APRH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, APRH paid 5.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.3%, paid quarterly.
LOCT in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LOCT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.2%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, APRH or LOCT?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, APRH paid 5.9% of its starting price in cash and LOCT paid 5.2%, so APRH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, APRH or LOCT?
- With every distribution reinvested, APRH returned +6.5% and LOCT returned +5.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so APRH returned more.
- Which is cheaper, APRH or LOCT?
- APRH charges 0.79% a year and LOCT charges 0.79%, so APRH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, APRH against LOCT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprh-vs-loct Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.