Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

APLY vs XDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year APLY paid 32.4% of its price in cash against XDTE’s 26.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

32.4%APLY cash paid, 1 year
26.9%XDTE cash paid, 1 year
+26.4%APLY total return, 1 year
+16.6%XDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XDTE scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

APLY 45.9XDTE 46.39.1, the lowest in this set97.6, the highest

A percentile among the 61 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

APLY18.6 pts behind AAPL · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
AAPL+45.0%APLY+26.4%32.4% of it arrived as cash18.6 pts behind AAPLTotal return, distributions reinvestedAAPL+45.0%APLY+26.4%32.4% cash18.6 pts behind AAPL
XDTE0.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
SPY+17.5%XDTE+16.6%26.9% of it arrived as cash0.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+17.5%XDTE+16.6%0.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, APLY and XDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in APLYOnly in XDTE
TREASURY BILL 27.23%SPX 03/19/2027 678.8 C 67.54%
TREASURY BILL 19.97%SPX 06/11/2027 678.8 C 25.09%
TREASURY BILL 19.80%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 7.36%
TREASURY BILL 19.47%
TREASURY BILL 13.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

APLY and XDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
APLYXDTEAPLYXDTEAPLYXDTE
3 months+8.2%+3.9%8.3%5.1%−6.1 pts+0.6 pts
6 months+21.6%+13.4%18.2%10.5%−11.4 pts−2.6 pts
1 year+26.4%+16.6%32.4%26.9%−18.6 pts−0.9 pts
3 years+52.2%not published69.8%not published−38.8 ptsnot published
Since launch+55.8%+45.7%74.3%59.3%−47.0 pts−7.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
APLY and XDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APLY
YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on AAPL, paying weekly
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerYieldMaxRoundhill
Strategysynthetic covered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkApple (AAPL)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized19.8%17.6%
Expense ratio1.04%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year32.4%26.9%
Price change, 1 year−9.6%−12.8%
Total return, 1 year+26.4%+16.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year+45.0%+17.5%
Ahead or behind−18.6 pts−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate84%not published
Age1242 days918 days

APLY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, APLY paid 32.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +26.4%. Apple (AAPL) returned +45.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 18.6 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 84% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, XDTE paid 26.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.6%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APLY or XDTE?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, APLY paid 32.4% of its starting price in cash and XDTE paid 26.9%, so APLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APLY or XDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, APLY returned +26.4% and XDTE returned +16.6% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so APLY returned more.
Which is cheaper, APLY or XDTE?
APLY charges 1.04% a year and XDTE charges 0.97%, so XDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

APLY against XDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APLY against XDTE, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aply-vs-xdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources