Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

APLY vs TSLY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year TSLY paid 53.2% of its price in cash against APLY’s 32.4%, though APLY returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax(R) TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

32.4%APLY cash paid, 1 year
53.2%TSLY cash paid, 1 year
+26.4%APLY total return, 1 year
+3.9%TSLY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: TSLY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

APLY 45.9TSLY 69.79.1, the lowest in this set97.6, the highest

A percentile among the 61 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

APLY18.6 pts behind AAPL · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
AAPL+45.0%APLY+26.4%32.4% of it arrived as cash18.6 pts behind AAPLTotal return, distributions reinvestedAAPL+45.0%APLY+26.4%32.4% cash18.6 pts behind AAPL
TSLY4.8 pts ahead of TSLA · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA−0.9%TSLY+3.9%4.8 pts ahead of TSLATotal return, distributions reinvestedTSLA−0.9%TSLY+3.9%4.8 pts ahead of TSLA

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, APLY and TSLY hold 85% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions APLY and TSLY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAPLYTSLY
TREASURY BILL19.97%22.62%
TREASURY BILL19.80%20.60%
TREASURY BILL19.47%22.39%
TREASURY BILL13.52%22.04%
TREASURY BILL27.23%12.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

APLY and TSLY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
APLYTSLYAPLYTSLYAPLYTSLY
3 months+8.2%−9.9%8.3%10.8%−6.1 pts+0.2 pts
6 months+21.6%−7.9%18.2%22.0%−11.4 pts−1.3 pts
1 year+26.4%+3.9%32.4%53.2%−18.6 pts+4.8 pts
3 years+52.2%+19.4%69.8%83.5%−38.8 pts−17.2 pts
Since launch+55.8%+38.5%74.3%97.1%−47.0 pts−61.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
APLY and TSLY on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APLY
YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on AAPL, paying weekly
TSLY
YieldMax(R) TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on TSLA, paying weekly
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Strategysynthetic covered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkApple (AAPL)Tesla (TSLA)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized19.8%50.0%
Expense ratio1.04%1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year32.4%53.2%
Price change, 1 year−9.6%−44.2%
Total return, 1 year+26.4%+3.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+45.0%−0.9%
Ahead or behind−18.6 pts+4.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate84%100%
Age1242 days1388 days

APLY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, APLY paid 32.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +26.4%. Apple (AAPL) returned +45.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 18.6 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 84% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

TSLY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, TSLY paid 53.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 44.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.9%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −0.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 50.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APLY or TSLY?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, APLY paid 32.4% of its starting price in cash and TSLY paid 53.2%, so TSLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APLY or TSLY?
With every distribution reinvested, APLY returned +26.4% and TSLY returned +3.9% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so APLY returned more.
Which is cheaper, APLY or TSLY?
APLY charges 1.04% a year and TSLY charges 1.07%, so APLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

APLY against TSLY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APLY against TSLY, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aply-vs-tsly Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources