Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AMZY vs XYLD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year AMZY paid 35.9% of its price in cash against XYLD’s 11.0%, though XYLD returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

35.9%AMZY cash paid, 1 year
11.0%XYLD cash paid, 1 year
+7.7%AMZY total return, 1 year
+17.9%XYLD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XYLD scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

AMZY 56.5XYLD 72.19.1, the lowest in this set97.6, the highest

A percentile among the 61 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

AMZY4 pts behind AMZN · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
AMZN+11.7%AMZY+7.7%35.9% of it arrived as cash4 pts behind AMZNTotal return, distributions reinvestedAMZN+11.7%AMZY+7.7%4 pts behind AMZN
XYLD1.2 pts behind ACWI · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
ACWI+19.1%XYLD+17.9%11.0% of it arrived as cash1.2 pts behind ACWITotal return, distributions reinvestedACWI+19.1%XYLD+17.9%11.0% cash1.2 pts behind ACWI

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AMZY and XYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AMZYOnly in XYLD
TREASURY BILL 29.93%NVIDIA CORP 8.01%
TREASURY BILL 28.22%APPLE INC 7.39%
TREASURY BILL 27.36%MICROSOFT CORP 5.58%
TREASURY BILL 8.79%AMAZON.COM INC 3.81%
TREASURY BILL 5.70%ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.01%
BROADCOM INC 2.60%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.40%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

AMZY and XYLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
AMZYXYLDAMZYXYLDAMZYXYLD
3 months+7.2%+5.0%9.6%2.6%−0.5 pts+1.9 pts
6 months+19.1%+10.5%23.2%5.5%−4.6 pts−5.1 pts
1 year+7.7%+17.9%35.9%11.0%−4.0 pts−1.2 pts
3 years+70.6%+43.2%97.3%32.9%−11.2 pts−32.8 pts
Since launch+88.3%+190.8%107.5%112.9%−10.6 pts−133.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AMZY and XYLD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AMZY
YieldMax(R) AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on AMZN, paying weekly
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on ACWI, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxGlobal X
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkAmazon (AMZN)All-country world (ACWI)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized25.3%9.0%
Expense ratio1.09%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year35.9%11.0%
Price change, 1 year−30.5%+5.9%
Total return, 1 year+7.7%+17.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.7%+19.1%
Ahead or behind−4.0 pts−1.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate34%93%
Age1144 days4827 days

AMZY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, AMZY paid 35.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.7%. Amazon (AMZN) returned +11.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.0 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 34% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, XYLD paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. All-country world (ACWI) returned +19.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, AMZY or XYLD?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, AMZY paid 35.9% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.0%, so AMZY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, AMZY or XYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, AMZY returned +7.7% and XYLD returned +17.9% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so XYLD returned more.
Which is cheaper, AMZY or XYLD?
AMZY charges 1.09% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AMZY against XYLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AMZY against XYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/amzy-vs-xyld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources