Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACQQ vs DOGG: which paid, and which earned it?

ACQQ and DOGG both write options for income.

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF.

0.0%ACQQ cash paid, 1 year
9.6%DOGG cash paid, 1 year
−2.1%ACQQ total return, 1 year
+18.1%DOGG total return, 1 year
ACQQ0.8 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ−1.3%ACQQ−2.1%0.8 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ−1.3%ACQQ−2.1%0.8 pts behind QQQ
DOGG4.6 pts ahead of DIA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
DIA+13.5%DOGG+18.1%9.6% of it arrived as cash4.6 pts ahead of DIATotal return, distributions reinvestedDIA+13.5%DOGG+18.1%4.6 pts ahead of DIA

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and DOGG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACQQOnly in DOGG
NDX100 35% VOLATILITY AUTOCALLABLE SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 69.94%
Merck & Co., Inc. 7.18%
The Procter & Gamble Company 6.47%
Amgen Inc. 6.33%
Chevron Corporation 5.81%
Verizon Communications Inc. 5.55%
The Coca-Cola Company 5.47%
McDonald's Corporation 4.92%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACQQ and DOGG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACQQDOGGACQQDOGGACQQDOGG
3 monthsnot published+2.5%not published2.3%not published+2.1 pts
6 monthsnot published+3.9%not published4.5%not published−10.1 pts
1 yearnot published+18.1%not published9.6%not published+4.6 pts
3 yearsnot published+40.2%not published28.0%not published−16.7 pts
Since launch−2.1%+43.7%0.0%30.9%−0.8 pts−17.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACQQ and DOGG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on QQQ
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
Option income on DIA, paying monthly
IssuerProSharesFirst Trust
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published9.1%
Expense ratio0.72%0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)9.6%
Price change, 1 year−2.1%+8.0%
Total return, 1 year−2.1% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+18.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.3%+13.5%
Ahead or behind−0.8 pts+4.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days1240 days
Net assets$23m$87m

ACQQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −1.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.

DOGG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACQQ or DOGG?
ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and DOGG charges 0.75%, so ACQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACQQ against DOGG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against DOGG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-dogg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources