Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
UOCT vs ZALT: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 UOCT can fall 5.7% before its buffer engages and ZALT 0.8%, and ZALT resets 273 days sooner.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about UOCT and ZALT
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $271m for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - Oct and $845m for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly.
UOCT: reference +0.5% since period start, fund +0.7%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +15.3%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
UOCT: reference +0.5% since period start, fund +0.7%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +15.3%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.ZALT: reference +0.5% since period start, fund +0.7%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +3.6%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
ZALT: reference +0.5% since period start, fund +0.7%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +3.6%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
ZALT costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.2 points; ZALT is 3.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | UOCT | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +10.3% | +8.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 5.5% | 0.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.69% |
| Net assets | $271m | $845m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed
Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Oct 13, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 159 weekly returns · each against SPYFrom Oct 2023 to Oct 2026, UOCT returned slightly more: +38.0% to +34.4%. ZALT swung less: 5.5% to 6.2%. ZALT fell less at its worst: −7.0% to −8.3%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | UOCT | ZALT | SPY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +38.0% | +34.4% | UOCT (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +11.1% | +10.2% | UOCT (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +38.0% | +34.4% | UOCT (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 6.2% | 5.5% | ZALT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 3.9% | 3.8% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −8.3% | −7.0% | ZALT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 32.4% | 26.9% | 100.0% | UOCT | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 42.8% | 34.4% | 100.0% | ZALT | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.41 | 0.35 | 1.00 | ZALT lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.86 | 0.83 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 1.01 | 0.98 | UOCT (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 1.61 | 1.40 | UOCT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.155 | 0.154 | 0.161 | Tie | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 1.34 | 1.44 | ZALT (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | SPY | SPY | SPY | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.2% a year | −0.3% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.19 | −0.20 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −2.9% to +2.4% | −2.9% to +2.3% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −1.12 | −1.12 | Tie | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 8.8% | 9.6% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 159 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | UOCT | ZALT | UOCT | ZALT |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +1.2% | +2.3 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +5.1% | +3.6% | +0.6 pts | −0.9 pts |
| 1 year | +10.3% | +8.1% | −3.3 pts | −5.4 pts |
| 3 years | +37.9% | +34.2% | −38.5 pts | −42.2 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: UOCT Oct 2018 · ZALT Oct 2023 | +77.5% | +35.9% | −85.4 pts | −43.6 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
They do not reset together. ZALT has 57 days of its period left and UOCT has 330, so the two are not the same bet on the same months.
Both are Innovator funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
ZALT resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 57 days from now; UOCT runs to Sep 30, 2027, 330 days. UOCT can still gain 14.4% before its cap, ZALT 2.8%. A fall from here reaches UOCT’s buffer after 5.7% and ZALT’s after 0.8%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
UOCT
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 14.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 5.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 5.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 330 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Sep 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
ZALT
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 2.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 57 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, UOCT against ZALT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/uoct-vs-zalt
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). UOCT against ZALT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/uoct-vs-zalt
[UOCT against ZALT (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/uoct-vs-zalt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.