Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
PMSE vs SEPP: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 PMSE can fall 1.1% before its buffer engages and SEPP 1.1%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PMSE and SEPPNet assets on Nov 4, 2026: $7.5m for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - September and $91m for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September.
PMSE: reference 0.0% since period start, fund +0.7%; buffer Floor; cap +8.3%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.SEPP: reference 0.0% since period start, fund +0.6%; buffer 0 to −12; cap +15.9%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SEPP: reference 0.0% since period start, fund +0.6%; buffer 0 to −12; cap +15.9%; Buffer working. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.50% a year; their one-year returns differ by 5.2 points; SEPP is 12.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | PMSE | SEPP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5.7% | +10.9% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $7.5m | $91m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | PMSE | SEPP | PMSE | SEPP |
| 3 months | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.3 pts | +1.5 pts |
| 6 months | +2.6% | +4.3% | −1.9 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 1 year | +5.7% | +10.9% | −7.8 pts | −2.7 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: PMSE Sep 2025 · SEPP May 2024 | +7.2% | +32.7% | −12.6 pts | −12.0 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. PMSE is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. SEPP is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Both are PGIM funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
PMSE resets first, on Aug 31, 2027, 300 days from now; SEPP runs to Aug 31, 2027, 300 days. PMSE can still gain 7.1% before its cap, SEPP 14.7%. A fall from here reaches PMSE’s buffer after 1.1% and SEPP’s after 1.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
PMSE
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 7.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 300 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Aug 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
SEPP
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 14.7% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PMSE against SEPP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pmse-vs-sepp
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). PMSE against SEPP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pmse-vs-sepp
[PMSE against SEPP (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pmse-vs-sepp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.