Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PMJA vs XBJA: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 XBJA can fall 8.5% before its buffer engages and PMJA 4.4%.

PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jan.

4.4%PMJA can fall this far before its buffer
8.5%XBJA can fall this far before its buffer
1.9%PMJA can still gain
2.5%XBJA can still gain
PMJAAt its cap
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+6.6% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+6.6% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%
XBJAAt its cap
9 pts+11.9%−9.0% floor0% period start+11.9% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%−9.0% floor0% start+11.9% capTODAY · SPY +13.5%

These are two different products. PMJA is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. XBJA is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

PMJA resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 101 days from now; XBJA runs to Dec 31, 2026, 101 days. PMJA can still gain 1.9% before its cap, XBJA 2.5%. A fall from here reaches PMJA’s buffer after 4.4% and XBJA’s after 8.5%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

PMJA and XBJA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
PMJAXBJAPMJAXBJA
3 months+1.5%+2.6%−0.8 pts+0.4 pts
6 months+4.4%+11.1%−13.6 pts−7.0 pts
1 year+5.9%+11.1%−10.7 pts−5.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+38.3%not published−40.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PMJA and XBJA on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PMJA
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 6.6%, over a period ending Dec 31, 2026
XBJA
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jan
Absorbs the first 9% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 11.9%, over a period ending Dec 31, 2026
IssuerPGIMInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer100%9%
Outcome periodJan 1, 2026 to Dec 31, 2026Dec 31, 2025 to Dec 31, 2026
Days left101101
Starting cap+6.6%+11.9%
Can still gain1.9%2.5%
Fall before buffer4.4%8.5%
Protection left, index points100.0% of 100.0%9.0% of 9.0%
Index return this period+13.5%+13.5%
Fund return this period+4.1%+8.7%
State todayAt capAt cap
Expense ratio0.50%0.79%
Net assets$6m$93m

PMJA in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.6% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.9% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 4.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 101 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

XBJA in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +11.9% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.5% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 8.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, PMJA or XBJA?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, PMJA can gain about 1.9% before its cap and XBJA about 2.5%, so XBJA has more room left this period.
Which resets first, PMJA or XBJA?
PMJA ends its outcome period on Dec 31, 2026 and XBJA on Dec 31, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, PMJA or XBJA?
PMJA charges 0.50% a year and XBJA charges 0.79%, so PMJA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PMJA against XBJA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PMJA against XBJA, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pmja-vs-xbja Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources