Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
PMAR vs UOCT: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 28, 2026 PMAR can fall 7.8% before its buffer engages and UOCT 6.0%, and PMAR resets 214 days sooner.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about PMAR and UOCT
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $748m for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - Mar and $269m for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - Oct.
PMAR: reference +12.5% since period start, fund +7.9%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Oct 28, 2026.
PMAR: reference +12.5% since period start, fund +7.9%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Oct 28, 2026.UOCT: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.0%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +15.3%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Oct 28, 2026.
UOCT: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +1.0%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +15.3%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Oct 28, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.79% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; PMAR is 2.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | PMAR | UOCT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +11.1% | +10.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 11.1% | 6.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $748m | $269m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed
A percentile among the 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Mar 13, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 345 weekly returns · each against SPYPMAR returned more: +98.4% to +82.0%. UOCT swung less: 6.8% to 9.3%. UOCT fell less at its worst: −8.3% to −10.2%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | PMAR | UOCT | SPY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +98.4% | +82.0% | PMAR | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +10.9% | +9.4% | PMAR | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +98.4% | +82.0% | PMAR | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 9.3% | 6.8% | UOCT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 6.3% | 4.3% | UOCT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −10.2% | −8.3% | UOCT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 33.1% | 25.7% | 100.0% | PMAR | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 48.8% | 39.0% | 100.0% | UOCT | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.49 | 0.35 | 1.00 | UOCT lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.89 | 0.86 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.84 | 0.93 | UOCT (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 1.23 | 1.44 | UOCT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.160 | 0.180 | 0.158 | UOCT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 1.06 | 1.14 | UOCT (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | SPY | SPY | SPY | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.1% a year | +0.8% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.11 | 0.81 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −2.3% to +2.5% | −1.1% to +2.7% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −0.81 | −0.79 | UOCT (slight) | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 9.8% | 12.0% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 345 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | PMAR | UOCT | PMAR | UOCT |
| 3 months | +3.4% | +4.3% | −2.4 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +5.6% | +6.8% | −2.9 pts | −1.7 pts |
| 1 year | +11.1% | +10.0% | −1.3 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 3 years | +50.2% | +43.1% | −37.9 pts | −44.9 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: PMAR Mar 2020 · UOCT Oct 2018 | +84.6% | +78.4% | −65.3 pts | −86.3 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
They do not reset together. PMAR has 123 days of its period left and UOCT has 337, so the two are not the same bet on the same months.
Both are Innovator funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
PMAR resets first, on Feb 28, 2027, 123 days from now; UOCT runs to Sep 30, 2027, 337 days. PMAR can still gain 4.0% before its cap, UOCT 14.1%. A fall from here reaches PMAR’s buffer after 7.8% and UOCT’s after 6.0%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
PMAR and UOCT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Protection and cap. PMAR: Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 12.8%, over a period ending Feb 28, 2027. UOCT: Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 35.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 15.3%, over a period ending Sep 30, 2027. The starting caps are 2.5 points apart.
- Outcome period. PMAR runs Feb 28, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027 with 123 days left; UOCT runs Sep 30, 2026 to Sep 30, 2027 with 337 days left.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow SPY.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
PMAR
From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 4.0% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 7.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 123 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
UOCT
From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 14.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 6.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 6.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 337 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Sep 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, PMAR against UOCT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pmar-vs-uoct
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). PMAR against UOCT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pmar-vs-uoct
[PMAR against UOCT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pmar-vs-uoct)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.