Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PBJN vs XMAY: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 XMAY can fall 4.1% before its buffer engages and PBJN 2.5%, and XMAY resets 10 days sooner.

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June and FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May.

2.5%PBJN can fall this far before its buffer
4.1%XMAY can fall this far before its buffer
9.3%PBJN can still gain
6.6%XMAY can still gain
PBJNBetween buffer and cap
20 pts of buffer+9.8% more to the cap−20.0% floor0% period start+12.1% capTODAY · SPY +2.3%20 pts of buffer−20.0% floor0% start+12.1% capTODAY · SPY +2.3%
XMAYBetween buffer and cap
15 pts of buffer+4.7% gained+6.3% to cap−15.0% floor0% period start+11.0% capTODAY · SPY +4.7%15 pts−15.0% floor0% start+11.0% capTODAY · SPY +4.7%

These are two different products. XMAY is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. PBJN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

XMAY resets first, on May 21, 2027, 242 days from now; PBJN runs to May 31, 2027, 252 days. PBJN can still gain 9.3% before its cap, XMAY 6.6%. A fall from here reaches PBJN’s buffer after 2.5% and XMAY’s after 4.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

PBJN and XMAY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
PBJNXMAYPBJNXMAY
3 months+1.6%+2.1%−0.6 pts−0.1 pts
6 months+5.2%+5.7%−12.8 pts−12.3 pts
1 year+6.9%+7.7%−9.7 pts−8.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PBJN and XMAY on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PBJN
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June
Absorbs the first 20% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 12.1%, over a period ending May 31, 2027
XMAY
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 11.0%, over a period ending May 21, 2027
IssuerPGIMFirst Trust
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer20%15%
Outcome periodJun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027May 18, 2026 to May 21, 2027
Days left252242
Starting cap+12.1%+11.0%
Can still gain9.3%6.6%
Fall before buffer2.5%4.1%
Protection left, index points20.0% of 20.0%15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period+2.3%+4.7%
Fund return this period+2.1%+3.4%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.50%0.85%
Net assets$58m$19m

PBJN in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 252 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

XMAY in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 6.6% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 4.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 242 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On May 21, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, PBJN or XMAY?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, PBJN can gain about 9.3% before its cap and XMAY about 6.6%, so PBJN has more room left this period.
Which resets first, PBJN or XMAY?
PBJN ends its outcome period on May 31, 2027 and XMAY on May 21, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, PBJN or XMAY?
PBJN charges 0.50% a year and XMAY charges 0.85%, so PBJN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PBJN against XMAY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PBJN against XMAY, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/pbjn-vs-xmay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources