Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
NVBW vs PMNV: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 NVBW can fall 1.4% before its buffer engages and PMNV 0.9%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about NVBW and PMNV
Net assets: $101m on Nov 3, 2026 for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETF - Nov, and $5.6m on Nov 4, 2026 for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November.
NVBW: reference +1.5% since period start, fund +0.7%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +12.7%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
NVBW: reference +1.5% since period start, fund +0.7%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +12.7%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.PMNV: reference +1.5% since period start, fund +0.4%; buffer Floor; cap +8.3%; Full floor. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
PMNV costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.3 points; NVBW is 19.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | NVBW | PMNV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +11.2% | +6.9% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $101m | $5.1m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | NVBW | PMNV | NVBW | PMNV |
| 3 months | +2.7% | +1.9% | +3.1 pts | +2.3 pts |
| 6 months | +5.8% | +3.8% | +1.3 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 1 year | +11.2% | +6.9% | −2.4 pts | −6.6 pts |
| 3 years | +35.7% | – | −40.7 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: NVBW Nov 2022 · PMNV Nov 2025 | +48.2% | +6.8% | −51.2 pts | −5.4 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. PMNV is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. NVBW is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
NVBW resets first, on Oct 31, 2027, 361 days from now; PMNV runs to Oct 31, 2027, 361 days. NVBW can still gain 11.2% before its cap, PMNV 7.4%. A fall from here reaches NVBW’s buffer after 1.4% and PMNV’s after 0.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
NVBW
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 11.2% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 361 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Oct 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
PMNV
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 7.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NVBW against PMNV, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/nvbw-vs-pmnv
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). NVBW against PMNV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/nvbw-vs-pmnv
[NVBW against PMNV (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/nvbw-vs-pmnv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.