Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAYC vs UMAY: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 UMAY can fall 9.2% before its buffer engages and MAYC 5.7%, and UMAY resets 3 days sooner.

Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May.

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: UMAY scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

MAYC 38.1UMAY 51.70.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MAYCBetween buffer and cap
10 pts of buffer+6% gained+7.5% to cap−10.0% floor0% period start+13.5% capTODAY · SPY +6.0%−10.0% floor0% start+13.5% capTODAY · SPY +6.0%
UMAYBetween buffer and cap
30 pts of buffer+7.7% gained−35.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% period start+12.5% capTODAY · SPY +7.7%30 pts of buffer−35.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% start+12.5% capTODAY · SPY +7.7%

Where each one stands today

UMAY resets first, on Apr 30, 2027, 221 days from now; MAYC runs to Apr 30, 2027, 224 days. A fall from here reaches MAYC’s buffer after 5.7% and UMAY’s after 9.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

MAYC and UMAY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
MAYCUMAYMAYCUMAY
3 months+1.6%+1.9%−0.6 pts−0.4 pts
6 monthsnot published+5.7%not published−12.4 pts
1 yearnot published+8.0%not published−8.6 pts
3 yearsnot published+37.6%not published−40.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAYC and UMAY on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAYC
Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series
Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.5%, over a period ending Apr 30, 2027
UMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May
Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 35.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 12.5%, over a period ending Apr 30, 2027
IssuerCorgiInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer10%5% to 35%
Outcome periodMay 1, 2026 to Apr 30, 2027Apr 30, 2026 to Apr 30, 2027
Days left224221
Starting cap+13.5%+12.5%
Can still gainnot published7.6%
Fall before buffer5.7%9.2%
Protection left, index points10.0% of 10.0%30.0% of 30.0%
Index return this period+6.0%+7.7%
Fund return this period+5.0%+4.3%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.30%0.79%
Net assets$2m$139m

MAYC in plain words

The fund's price can fall 5.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 5.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 224 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Apr 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

UMAY in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 7.6% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 9.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.8% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 221 days remained on Sep 21, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, MAYC or UMAY?
MAYC ends its outcome period on Apr 30, 2027 and UMAY on Apr 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, MAYC or UMAY?
MAYC charges 0.30% a year and UMAY charges 0.79%, so MAYC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAYC against UMAY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAYC against UMAY, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/mayc-vs-umay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources