Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MARU vs ZMAR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 MARU can fall 8.2% before its buffer engages and ZMAR 4.2%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MARU and ZMAR
Net assets: $35m on Nov 3, 2026 for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Mar, and $109m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March.
MARU: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +8.1%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MARU: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +8.1%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.ZMAR: reference +11.7% since period start, fund +3.8%; buffer Floor; cap +6.7%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
MARU costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points; ZMAR is 3.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MARU | ZMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +8.7% | +6.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 10.5% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.79% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $35m | $109m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MARU | ZMAR | MARU | ZMAR |
| 3 months | −1.2% | +1.2% | −0.8 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +2.5% | +2.6% | −2.0 pts | −1.9 pts |
| 1 year | +8.7% | +6.1% | −4.9 pts | −7.5 pts |
| Since launchMARU Mar 2025 · ZMAR Mar 2025 | +21.7% | +11.0% | −9.7 pts | −20.3 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. ZMAR is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. MARU is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
ZMAR is already at its cap, so more rise in the index adds nothing to it before the period ends.
Where each one stands today
MARU resets first, on Feb 28, 2027, 116 days from now; ZMAR runs to Feb 28, 2027, 116 days. A fall from here reaches MARU’s buffer after 8.2% and ZMAR’s after 4.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
MARU
This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPY. The fund's price can fall 8.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 116 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and new terms are set.
ZMAR
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.7% for the period on Nov 4, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.3% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 4.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MARU against ZMAR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/maru-vs-zmar
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MARU against ZMAR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/maru-vs-zmar
[MARU against ZMAR (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/maru-vs-zmar)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.