Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MART vs MARU: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 MART can fall 9.4% before its buffer engages and MARU 8.2%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MART and MARU
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $29m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 ETF - Mar and $35m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Mar.
MART: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +9.4%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.9%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MART: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +9.4%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.9%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.MARU: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +8.1%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MARU: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +8.1%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.74% a year; their one-year returns differ by 5.6 points; MARU is 1.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MART | MARU |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.3% | +8.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 10.5% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.74% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $29m | $35m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed
Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Mar 14, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 85 weekly returns · each against SPYFrom Mar 2025 to Oct 2026, MART returned more: +27.9% to +22.9%. MART swung less: 9.5% to 10.6%. MARU fell less at its worst: −6.3% to −7.4%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MART | MARU | SPY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +27.9% | +22.9% | MART | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +16.3% | +13.5% | MART | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +27.9% | +22.9% | MART | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 9.5% | 10.6% | MART | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 6.3% | 7.0% | MART (slight) | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −7.4% | −6.3% | MARU | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 50.6% | 64.5% | 100.0% | MARU | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 58.7% | 83.8% | 100.0% | MART | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.61 | 0.68 | 1.00 | MART lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.96 | 0.94 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 1.22 | 0.87 | MART | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 1.82 | 1.33 | MART | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.189 | 0.136 | 0.164 | MART | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 2.19 | 2.15 | Tie | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | SPY | SPY | SPY | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +1.5% a year | −1.9% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.94 | −0.92 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −1.7% to +4.7% | −6.0% to +2.2% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −0.78 | −1.30 | MART | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 6.2% | 5.5% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 85 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MART | MARU | MART | MARU |
| 3 months | +1.4% | −1.2% | +1.8 pts | −0.8 pts |
| 6 months | +4.9% | +2.5% | +0.5 pts | −2.0 pts |
| 1 year | +14.3% | +8.7% | +0.8 pts | −4.9 pts |
| 3 years | +59.1% | – | −17.3 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: MART Mar 2023 · MARU Mar 2025 | +73.9% | +21.7% | −20.4 pts | −9.7 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Both are AllianzIM funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
MART resets first, on Feb 28, 2027, 116 days from now; MARU runs to Feb 28, 2027, 116 days. A fall from here reaches MART’s buffer after 9.4% and MARU’s after 8.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MART
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.2% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 9.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 116 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
MARU
This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPY. The fund's price can fall 8.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and new terms are set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MART against MARU, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/mart-vs-maru
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MART against MARU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/mart-vs-maru
[MART against MARU (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/mart-vs-maru)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.